Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of Exogenous and Endogenous Hormones in Endometrial Cancer: Review of the Evidence and Research Perspectives

AKHMEDKHANOV, ARSLAN, ZELENIUCH‐JACQUOTTE, ANNE, TONIOLO, PAOLO·2001·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common cancer of the female reproductive organs in the United States. International comparisons reveal that the incidence of endometrial cancer vary widely between different countries with the highest rates observed in North America and Northern Europe, intermediate rates in Eastern Europe and Latin America, and lowest rates in Asia and Africa. International variation in endometrial cancer rates may represent differences in the distribution of known risk factors, which include obesity, postmenopausal estrogen replacement, ovarian dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, infertility, nulliparity, and tamoxifen use. Most of the risk factors for endometrial cancer can be explained within the framework of the unopposed estrogen hypothesis, which proposes that exposure to estrogens unopposed by progesterone or synthetic progestins leads to increased mitotic activity of endometrial cells, increased number of DNA replication errors, and somatic mutations resulting in malignant phenotype. Although the impact of exogenous hormone replacement was intensively studied during the last two decades, less is known about the effects of endogenous hormones in endometrial cancer. A review of available experimental, clinical, and epidemiologic data suggests that in addition to estrogens, other endogenous hormones, including progesterone, androgens, gonadotropins, prolactin, insulin, and insulin‐like growth factors, may play a role in the pathogenesis of different histopathologic types of endometrial cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03811.x

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 109 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
AKHMEDKHANOV, A., ZELENIUCH‐JACQUOTTE, A., & TONIOLO, P.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
943
Issue
1
Pages
296-315
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1862864205
Cited by
269
References
109
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Exogenous and Endogenous Hormones in Endometrial Cancer: Review of the Evidence and Research Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03811.x
The paper
AKHMEDKHANOV, A., ZELENIUCH‐JACQUOTTE, A., & TONIOLO, P. (2001). Role of Exogenous and Endogenous Hormones in Endometrial Cancer: Review of the Evidence and Research Perspectives. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03811.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.