Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis

BOULLIER, AGNES, BIRD, DAVID A., CHANG, MI‐KYUNG, DENNIS, EDWARD A., FRIEDMAN, PETER, GILLOTTE‐TAYLOR, KRISTIN, HÖRKKÖ, SOHVI, PALINSKI, WULF, QUEHENBERGER, OSWALD, SHAW, PETER, STEINBERG, DANIEL, TERPSTRA, VALESKA, WITZTUM, JOSEPH L.·2001·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: Oxidized LDL (OxLDL) competes with oxidatively damaged and apoptotic cells for binding to mouse peritoneal macrophages, implying the presence of one or more common domains. However, the nature of the ligands involved has not been determined. Studies in this laboratory over the last several years provide evidence that oxidized phospholipids, present in OxLDL and also in the membrane of apoptotic cells, represent one such ligand. These oxidized phospholipids, either in the lipid phase of OxLDL or becoming attached covalently to apoprotein B during LDL oxidation, have been shown to play a major role in the binding of OxLDL to CD36 and to SR‐B1 expressed in transfected cells. The lipid and protein moieties compete with each other to some extent, indicating that they are binding to at least one common site. A monoclonal antibody selected because of its reactivity with OxLDL proved to be an antibody against oxidized phospholipids (but not native phospholipids). This antibody (EO6) blocked the uptake of OxLDL by CD36 and by SR‐B1 in transfected cells by as much as 80%; it also inhibited macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by about 40%. Thus, the persistence of receptors for OxLDL during evolution is probably accounted for by their role in recognition of ligands on the surfaces of oxidatively damaged or apoptotic cells. This has important implications in biology generally and specifically in atherogenesis, because apoptosis is a prominent feature of late lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03943.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
BOULLIER, A., BIRD, D. A., CHANG, M., DENNIS, E. A., FRIEDMAN, P., GILLOTTE‐TAYLOR, K., HÖRKKÖ, S., PALINSKI, W., QUEHENBERGER, O., SHAW, P., STEINBERG, D., TERPSTRA, V., & WITZTUM, J. L.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
947
Issue
1
Pages
214-223
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1978435323
Cited by
330
References
0
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03943.x
The paper
BOULLIER, A., BIRD, D. A., CHANG, M., DENNIS, E. A., FRIEDMAN, P., GILLOTTE‐TAYLOR, K., HÖRKKÖ, S., PALINSKI, W., QUEHENBERGER, O., SHAW, P., STEINBERG, D., TERPSTRA, V., & WITZTUM, J. L. (2001). Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03943.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.