The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis
Abstract
A bstract: Oxidized LDL (OxLDL) competes with oxidatively damaged and apoptotic cells for binding to mouse peritoneal macrophages, implying the presence of one or more common domains. However, the nature of the ligands involved has not been determined. Studies in this laboratory over the last several years provide evidence that oxidized phospholipids, present in OxLDL and also in the membrane of apoptotic cells, represent one such ligand. These oxidized phospholipids, either in the lipid phase of OxLDL or becoming attached covalently to apoprotein B during LDL oxidation, have been shown to play a major role in the binding of OxLDL to CD36 and to SR‐B1 expressed in transfected cells. The lipid and protein moieties compete with each other to some extent, indicating that they are binding to at least one common site. A monoclonal antibody selected because of its reactivity with OxLDL proved to be an antibody against oxidized phospholipids (but not native phospholipids). This antibody (EO6) blocked the uptake of OxLDL by CD36 and by SR‐B1 in transfected cells by as much as 80%; it also inhibited macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by about 40%. Thus, the persistence of receptors for OxLDL during evolution is probably accounted for by their role in recognition of ligands on the surfaces of oxidatively damaged or apoptotic cells. This has important implications in biology generally and specifically in atherogenesis, because apoptosis is a prominent feature of late lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,737
The macrophage foam cell as a target for therapeutic intervention
Li, A. C., & Glass, C. K. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1102-1235 · Cited by 700
Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis
Sierra, A., Abiega, O., Shahraz, A., & Neumann, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00006 · Cited by 574
Napoli, C., Martin-Padura, I., de Nigris, F., Giorgio, M., Mansueto, G., Somma, P., Condorelli, M., Sica, G., De Rosa, G., & Pelicci, P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0336359100 · Cited by 380
Apolipoprotein-mediated pathways of lipid antigen presentation
Elzen, P. V. D., Garg, S., León, L., Brigl, M., Leadbetter, E. A., Gumperz, J. E., Dascher, C. C., Cheng, T.-Y., Sacks, F. M., Illarionov, P. A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04001 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- BOULLIER, A., BIRD, D. A., CHANG, M., DENNIS, E. A., FRIEDMAN, P., GILLOTTE‐TAYLOR, K., HÖRKKÖ, S., PALINSKI, W., QUEHENBERGER, O., SHAW, P., STEINBERG, D., TERPSTRA, V., & WITZTUM, J. L.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 947
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 214-223
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1978435323
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03943.x
- The paper
- BOULLIER, A., BIRD, D. A., CHANG, M., DENNIS, E. A., FRIEDMAN, P., GILLOTTE‐TAYLOR, K., HÖRKKÖ, S., PALINSKI, W., QUEHENBERGER, O., SHAW, P., STEINBERG, D., TERPSTRA, V., & WITZTUM, J. L. (2001). Scavenger Receptors, Oxidized LDL, and Atherosclerosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03943.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.