Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroimaging and Obesity: Mapping the Brain Responses to Hunger and Satiation in Humans Using Positron Emission Tomography

DEL PARIGI, ANGELO, GAUTIER, JEAN‐FRANCOIS, CHEN, KEWEI, SALBE, ARLINE D., RAVUSSIN, ERIC, REIMAN, ERIC, TATARANNI, P. ANTONIO·2002·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: The hypothalamus has a major role in the control of food intake. However, neurotracing studies have shown that the hypothalamus receives input from several other regions of the brain that are likely to modulate its activity. Of particular interest to the understanding of human eating behavior is the possible involvement of the cortex. Using positron emission tomography (PET), we generated functional brain maps of the neuroanatomical correlates of hunger (after a 36‐h fast) and satiation (after oral administration of a liquid formula meal) in lean and obese subjects. Results in lean individuals indicate that the neuroanatomical correlates of hunger form a complex network of brain regions including the hypothalamus, thalamus, and several limbic/paralimbic areas such as the insula, hippocampal/parahippocampal formation, and the orbitofrontal cortex. Satiation was associated with preferentially increased neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex. Our studies also indicate that the brain responses to hunger/satiation in the hypothalamus, limbic/paralimbic areas (commonly associated with the regulation of emotion), and prefrontal cortex (thought to be involved in the inhibition of inappropriate response tendencies) might be different in obese and lean individuals. In conclusion, neuroimaging of the human brain is proving to be an important tool for understanding the complexity of brain involvement in the regulation of eating behavior. PET studies might help to unravel the neuropathophysiology underlying human obesity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04294.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
DEL PARIGI, A., GAUTIER, J., CHEN, K., SALBE, A. D., RAVUSSIN, E., REIMAN, E., & TATARANNI, P. A.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06
Volume
967
Issue
1
Pages
389-397
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W4297818860
Cited by
192
References
2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroimaging and Obesity: Mapping the Brain Responses to Hunger and Satiation in Humans Using Positron Emission Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04294.x
The paper
DEL PARIGI, A., GAUTIER, J., CHEN, K., SALBE, A. D., RAVUSSIN, E., REIMAN, E., & TATARANNI, P. A. (2002). Neuroimaging and Obesity: Mapping the Brain Responses to Hunger and Satiation in Humans Using Positron Emission Tomography. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04294.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.