Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathophysiology of Parkinson's Disease: The MPTP Primate Model of the Human Disorder

WICHMANN, THOMAS, DeLONG, MAHLON R.·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: The striatum is viewed as the principal input structure of the basal ganglia, while the internal pallidal segment (GPi) and the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) are output structures. Input and output structures are linked via a monosynaptic “direct” pathway and a polysynaptic “indirect” pathway involving the external pallidal segment (GPe) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). According to current schemes, striatal dopamine (DA) enhances transmission along the direct pathway (via D1 receptors), and reduces transmission over the indirect pathway (via D2 receptors). DA also acts on receptors in GPe, GPi, SNr, and STN. Electrophysiologic and other studies in primates rendered parkinsonian by treatment with the dopaminergic neurotoxin MPTP have demonstrated a reduction of neuronal activity of GPe and an increase of neuronal discharge in STN, GPi. and SNr. These findings are compatible with the view that striatal DA loss results in increased activity over the indirect pathway. Prominent bursting, oscillatory discharge patterns, and increased synchronization of neighboring neurons are found throughout the basal ganglia. These may result from changes in the activity of local circuits (e.g., the GPe‐STN “pacemaker”) or from more global abnormalities of the basal ganglia‐thalamocortical network. These findings have been replicated in human patients undergoing microelectrode‐guided stereotactic procedures targeted at GPi or STN. PET studies in patients with Parkinson's disease have lent further support to the proposed circuit abnormalities. The current models of basal ganglia function have recently been criticized. For instance, the strict separation of direct and indirect pathways and the segregation of D1 and D2 receptors have been questioned, and the almost complete absence of motor side effects of pallidal or thalamic lesions in human patients and animals is inconsistent. These results suggest that changes in discharge patterns and synchronization between basal ganglia neurons, abnormal network interactions, and compensatory mechanisms are at least as important in the pathopohysiology of parkinsonism as changes in discharge rates in individual basal ganglia nuclei. Lesions of GPi or STN are effective in treating parkinsonism, because they reduce or abolish abnormal basal ganglia output, enabling remaining circuits to function more normally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
WICHMANN, T., & DeLONG, M. R.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06
Volume
991
Issue
1
Pages
199-213
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2051333776
Cited by
255
References
94
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathophysiology of Parkinson's Disease: The MPTP Primate Model of the Human Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x
The paper
WICHMANN, T., & DeLONG, M. R. (2003). Pathophysiology of Parkinson's Disease: The MPTP Primate Model of the Human Disorder. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.