The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Top‐Down Control of Rhythm Perception Modulates Early Auditory Responses
Abstract
Our perceptions are shaped by both extrinsic stimuli and intrinsic interpretation. The perceptual experience of a simple rhythm, for example, depends upon its metrical interpretation (where one hears the beat). Such interpretation can be altered at will, providing a model to study the interaction of endogenous and exogenous influences in the cognitive organization of perception. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we measured brain responses evoked by a repeating, rhythmically ambiguous phrase (two tones followed by a rest). In separate trials listeners were instructed to impose different metrical organizations on the rhythm by mentally placing the downbeat on either the first or the second tone. Since the stimulus was invariant, differences in brain activity between the two conditions should relate to endogenous metrical interpretation. Metrical interpretation influenced early evoked neural responses to tones, specifically in the upper beta range (20–30 Hz). Beta response was stronger (by 64% on average) when a tone was imagined to be the beat, compared to when it was not. A second experiment established that the beta increase closely resembles that due to physical accents, and thus may represent the genesis of a subjective accent. The results demonstrate endogenous modulation of early auditory responses, and suggest a unique role for the beta band in linking of endogenous and exogenous processing. Given the suggested role of beta in motor processing and long‐range intracortical coordination, it is hypothesized that the motor system influences metrical interpretation of sound, even in the absence of overt movement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties
Kopell, N., Ermentrout, G. B., Whittington, M. A., & Traub, R. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1867 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo?
Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · Cited by 2,953
Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions
Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 · Cited by 1,114
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012).
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationKeller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0394 · Cited by 466
Selective Neuronal Entrainment to the Beat and Meter Embedded in a Musical Rhythm
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., & Mouraux, A. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3203-12.2012 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H., & Patel, A. D.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 1169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-73
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2158074399
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top‐Down Control of Rhythm Perception Modulates Early Auditory Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04579.x
- The paper
- Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H., & Patel, A. D. (2009). Top‐Down Control of Rhythm Perception Modulates Early Auditory Responses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04579.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.