Is beat induction innate or learned?: probing emergent meter perception in adults and newborns using event-related brain potentials
Abstract
Meter is considered an important structuring mechanism in the perception and experience of rhythm in music. Combining behavioral and electrophysiological measures, in the present study we investigate whether meter is more likely a learned phenomenon, possibly a result of musical expertise, or whether sensitivity to meter is also active in adult nonmusicians and newborn infants. The results provide evidence that meter induction is active in adult nonmusicians and that beat induction is already functional right after birth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Music playing's engaging power applies to all ages.
“Its engaging power applies to all ages [2]”
From Hands-Free Accessible Digital Musical Instruments: Conceptual Framework, Challenges, and Perspectives (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Ladinig, O., Honing, H., Háden, G., & Winkler, I. (2009) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2009.26.4.377 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davanzo, N., & Avanzini, F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3019978 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Honing, H., Ladinig, O., Háden, G. P., & Winkler, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Honing, Henkjan
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 1169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-96
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1678596122
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- beat induction, rhythm perception, musicianship, non-musicians, neonates
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Music, Periodicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
