The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emulsion‐Based Delivery Systems for Lipophilic Bioactive Components
Abstract
ABSTRACT: There is a pressing need for edible delivery systems to encapsulate, protect, and release bioactive lipids within the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. The fact that these delivery systems must be edible puts constraints on the type of ingredients and processing operations that can be used to create them. Emulsion technology is particularly suited for the design and fabrication of delivery systems for encapsulating bioactive lipids. This review provides a brief overview of the major bioactive lipids that need to be delivered within the food industry (for example, ω‐3 fatty acids, carotenoids, and phytosterols), highlighting the main challenges to their current incorporation into foods. We then provide an overview of a number of emulsion‐based technologies that could be used as edible delivery systems by the food and other industries, including conventional emulsions, multiple emulsions, multilayer emulsions, solid lipid particles, and filled hydrogel particles. Each of these delivery systems could be produced from food‐grade (GRAS) ingredients (for example, lipids, proteins, polysaccharides, surfactants, and minerals) using simple processing operations (for example, mixing, homogenizing, and thermal processing). For each type of delivery system, we describe its structure, preparation, advantages, limitations, and potential applications. This knowledge can be used to facilitate the selection of the most appropriate emulsion‐based delivery system for specific applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marchioli, R., Barzi, F., Bomba, E., Chieffo, C., Di Gregorio, D., Di Mascio, R., Franzosi, M. G., Geraci, E., Levantesi, G., Maggioni, A. P., et al. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000014682.14181.f2 · Cited by 1,311
Freitas, S., Merkle, H. P., & Gander, B. (2005) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.015 · Cited by 923
Cited by
Factors Influencing the Chemical Stability of Carotenoids in Foods
Boon, C. S., McClements, D. J., Weiss, J., & Decker, E. A. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390802565889 · Cited by 828
Self-citationNanotechnology in agro-food: From field to plate
Dasgupta, N., Ranjan, S., Mundekkad, D., Ramalingam, C., Shanker, R., & Kumar, A. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.005 · Cited by 437
The Emulsifying and Emulsion‐Stabilizing Properties of Pectin: A Review
Ngouémazong, E. D., Christiaens, S., Shpigelman, A., Van Loey, A., & Hendrickx, M. (2015) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12160 · Cited by 394
Potential biological fate of ingested nanoemulsions: Influence of particle characteristics
McClements, D. J., & Xiao, H. (2012) · Food Funct. · doi:10.1039/c1fo10193e · Cited by 331
Self-citationChallenges and opportunities in CNS delivery of therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases
Barchet, T. M., & Amiji, M. M. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425240902758188 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- McClements, D. J., Decker, E. A., & Weiss, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- R109-24
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2006399057
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
