Comparison of 3 Spectrophotometric Methods for Carotenoid Determination in Frequently Consumed Fruits and Vegetables
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Carotenoids are C‐40 tetraterpenoid compounds with potential health beneficial effects. Major dietary sources include a variety of fruits and vegetables. Rapid screening methods are therefore desired, but their accuracy varies depending on the carotenoid profile and the matrix of the plant food. In the present study, 3 different methods were compared, all based on a rapid extraction protocol and spectrophotometric measurements to determine the total amount carotenoids present in fruits and vegetables ( n = 28), either with or without chlorophyll. Published methods (a) Lichtenthaler and (b) Hornero‐Méndez and Mínguez‐Mosquera were compared with a newly developed method (method c) based on the average molar absorption coefficient (135310 Lcm −1 mol −1 ) and wavelength (450 nm in acetone), for the 5 predominant carotenoid species (beta‐carotene, zeaxanthin, lycopene, lutein, beta‐cryptoxanthin) in the investigated foods. All results were compared to HPLC (method d). To avoid overestimating carotenoid concentrations due to chlorophyll A and B presence, the effect of saponification was studied for all methods. Overall, saponification led to significant carotenoid losses (12.6 ± 0.9%). Methods a, b, c, and d yielded 5.1 ± 0.4 mg/100 g, 4.6 ± 0.5 mg/100 g, 4.3 ± 0.5 mg/100 g, and 4.2 ± 0.5 mg/100 g total carotenoids, respectively, with method a leading to significant higher mean concentrations compared to all other methods ( P < 0.001, Bonferroni) with methods b and c being not significantly different and highly correlated compared to HPLC (> r = 0.95). Similar results were found when stratifying for chlorophyll content and fruits compared with vegetables, however, accuracy varied for individual fruits, highlighting the limitation to use the same method for all plant foods. Practical Application: This study presents a comparison of various rapid spectrophotometric measurements to determine total carotenoid content in various fruits and vegetables and could aid in the selection of the appropriate method for individual plant foods with different carotenoid profile and matrices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carotenoid (β-carotene) content was determined according to Biehler et al. [30].
“Carotenoid (β-carotene) content was determined according to Biehler et al. [30] and calculated using the formula: C = A 450 × M × 1000 / ε × δ; where: A = absorption (450 nm), M = β-carotene (molecular mass, 537 g -1 mol), ε = molar extinction coefficient of β-carotene in acetone (140.6 L -1 mol cm), δ = optical path (cm).”
From Azospirillum brasilense affects survival, growth and nutrient status of micropropagated sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plantlets during ex vitro conditions (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nutrition, Well-Being and Health
(2012) · doi:10.5772/1864 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationDrapal, M., & Fraser, P. D. (2019) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112102 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mancilla-Álvarez, E., López-Buenfil, J. A., Serrano-Fuentes, M. K., Reyes-Castillo, A., Sánchez-Páez, R., & Bello-Bello, J. J. (2025) · Discover Plants · doi:10.1007/s44372-025-00357-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Biehler, E., Mayer, F., Hoffmann, L., Krause, E., & Bohn, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre de recherche public Gabriel-Lippmann (LU)
- Corresponding author
- Biehler, Eric
- Mayer, Frédéric
- Hoffmann, Lucien
- Krause, Elmar
- Bohn, Torsten
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- C55-61
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2124873812
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- carotenoids, spectrophotometric assay, fruits and vegetables, beta-carotene, zeaxanthin, lycopene, lutein, beta-cryptoxanthin, saponification, molar absorptivity, method comparison, rapid screening
- MeSH terms
- Carotenoids, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fruit, Humans, Insurance Benefits, Solvents, Spectrophotometry, Vegetables, Xanthophylls
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review