Cited by 31Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

Comparison of Oxidized and Reduced Glutathione in the Bread-Making Qualities of Rice Batter

Yano, Hiroyuki·2012·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Abstract: The demand for gluten‐free bread is growing as the recognition of celiac disease and wheat allergy has increased worldwide. In our previous study, reduced glutathione (GSH) was found to improve the gas‐retaining properties of rice batter used for gluten‐free bread. In this article, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was shown to have the same effect. Moreover, sensory tests revealed that GSSG bread had a significantly reduced sulfurous odor. Analyses by a gas chromatography‐flame photometric detector demonstrated the presence of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan in the headspace of GSH bread, and also their significant reduction in GSSG bread. The viscoelastic properties and microstructures of GSSG and GSH bread did not noticeably differ. These observations suggest the usefulness of GSSG in making gluten‐free rice bread and extend our knowledge of the use of glutathione in food processing. Practical Application: Glutathione, a widely‐distributed peptide in cells, improves the bread‐making quality of gluten‐free rice batter. While both the reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione are effective, GSSG‐bread has significantly reduced sulfurous odor compared to GSH‐bread.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02556.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced glutathione improved the gas retaining properties of a gluten free rice batter dough in a yeast leavening process.

    “In a study by Yano (2012), reduced glutathione improved the gas retaining properties of a gluten free rice batter dough in a yeast leavening process [66].”
  • Reduced glutathione improved the gas retaining properties of a gluten free rice batter dough in a yeast leavening process.

    “In a study by Yano (2012), reduced glutathione improved the gas retaining properties of a gluten free rice batter dough in a yeast leavening process [66].”

    From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as Yano (2012)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yano, H.
Affiliations
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP)
Corresponding author
Yano, Hiroyuki
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
C182-8
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W1990220538
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22500752)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
glutathione disulfide, reduced glutathione, gluten-free bread, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, gas retention, bread-making quality, viscoelasticity, bread microstructure
MeSH terms
Bread, Celiac Disease, Food Handling, Glutathione, Odorants, Oxidation-Reduction, Rheology, Oryza, Viscosity, Glutathione Disulfide, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review