Cited by 38Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryDental Health and Care Utilization

Relationship between diet, dental calculus and periodontal disease in domestic and feral cats in Australia

CLARKE, DE, CAMERON, A.·1998·Australian Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Objective To compare the dental calculus scores and prevalence of periodontal disease in domestic cats eating commercially available canned and dry foods with those in feral cats consuming a diet consisting of small mammals, birds, reptiles and insects. Animals Twenty‐nine feral cats and 20 domestic cats were included in the study. Procedure A dental chart and dental calculus scores were recorded using the maxillary canine, maxillary third and fourth premolar, mandibular canine, mandibular fourth premolar and first molar teeth on both sides. Periodontal disease was recorded using gingival recession, increased periodontal pocket formation, radiographic alveolar bone loss, osteomyelitis, furcation and root exposure, and the presence of calculus as indicators. Results Dental calculus scores were significantly higher in domestic cats than in feral cats. There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of periodontal disease between the two groups. Conclusion It can be inferred that diet may play a role in the accumulation of calculus, but a diet based on live prey does not protect cats against periodontal disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1998.tb12284.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wild animals have superior oral health status to animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.

    “Wild animals have an oral health status superior to that of animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CLARKE, D., & CAMERON, A.
Affiliations
Matériaux et santé (FR)
Venue
Australian Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-10
Volume
76
Issue
10
Pages
690-693
ISSN
  • 0005-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-0813
OpenAlex
W2042334426
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
periodontal disease, dental calculus, feral cats, cats, feline diet, canned food, dry food, live prey, alveolar bone loss, gingival recession, osteomyelitis, furcation, root exposure, periodontal pocket formation
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dental Calculus, Diet, Periodontal Diseases, Victoria, Northern Territory, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review