Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structure and Biodistribution Relationships of Photodynamic Sensitizers*

Open access
Boyle, Ross W., Dolphin, David·1996·Photochemistry and Photobiology

Abstract

Abstract— Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has, during the last quarter century, developed into a fully fledged biomedical field with its own association, the International Photodynamic Association (IPA) and regular conferences devoted solely to this topic. Recent approval of the first PDT sensitizer, Photofrin® (porfimer sodium), by health boards in Canada, Japan, the Netherlands and United States for use against certain types of solid tumors represents, perhaps, the single most significant indicator of the progress of PDT from a laboratory research concept to clinical reality. The approval of Photofrin® will undoubtedly encourage the accelerated development of second‐generation photo‐sensitizers, which have recently been the subject of intense study. Many of these second‐generation drugs show significant differences, when compared to Photofrin®, in terms of treatment times postinjection, light doses and drug doses required for optimal results. These differences can ultimately be attributed to variations in either the quantum efficiency of the photosensitizer in situ, which is in turn affected by aggregation state, localized concentration of endogenous quenchers and primary photophysics of the dye, or the intratumoral and intracellular localization of the photosensitizer at the time of activation with light. The purpose of this review is to bring together data relating to the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of second‐generation sensitizers and attempt to correlate this with structural and electronic features of these molecules. As this requires a clear knowledge of photosensitizer structure, only chemically well‐characterized compounds are included, e.g. Photofrin® and crude sulfonated phthal‐ocyanines have been excluded as they are known to be complex mixtures. Nonporphyrin‐based photosensitizers, e.g. rose bengal and the hypericins, have also been omitted to allow meaningful comparisons to be made between different compounds. As the intracellular distribution of photosensitizers to organelles and other subcellular structures can have a large effect on PDT efficacy, a section will be devoted to this topic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03093.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Boyle, R. W., & Dolphin, D.
Venue
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
469-485
ISSN
  • 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-1097
OpenAlex
W2108899627
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
23.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Biodistribution Relationships of Photodynamic Sensitizers*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03093.x
The paper
Boyle, R. W., & Dolphin, D. (1996). Structure and Biodistribution Relationships of Photodynamic Sensitizers*. Photochemistry and Photobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03093.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.