The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Near‐Infrared Raman Spectroscopy for In Vitro Detection of Cervical Precancers
Abstract
Abstract— In this study, we investigate the potential of near‐infrared Raman spectroscopy to differentiate cervical precancers from normal tissues, inflammation and metaplasia and to differentially diagnose low‐grade and high‐grade precancers. Near infrared Raman spectra were measured from 36 biopsies from 18 patients in vitro. Detection algorithms were developed and evaluated relative to histopathologic examination. Algorithms based on empirically selected peak intensities, ratios of peak intensities and a combination of principal component analysis for data reduction and Fisher discriminant analysis for classification were investigated. Spectral peaks were tentatively identified from measured spectra of potential chromophores. Empirically selected normalized intensities can differentiate precancers from other tissues with an average sensitivity and specificity of 88 ± 4% and 92 ± 4%. Ratios of un‐normalized intensities can differentiate precancers from other tissues with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 88% and high‐grade from low‐grade lesions with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Using multivariate methods, intensities at eight frequencies can be used to differentiate precancers from all other tissues with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 92% in an unbiased test. Raman algorithms can potentially separate benign abnormalities such as inflammation and metaplasia from precancers. Comparison of tissue spectra to published and measured chromophore spectra indicate that the most likely primary contributors to the tissue spectra are collagen, nucleic acids, phospholipids and glucose 1‐phos‐phate. These results suggest that near‐infrared Raman spectroscopy can be used for cervical precancer diagnosis and may be able to accurately separate samples with inflammation and metaplasia from precancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automated Method for Subtraction of Fluorescence from Biological Raman Spectra
Lieber, C. A., & Mahadevan-Jansen, A. (2003) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1366/000370203322554518 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationProspects for in vivo Raman spectroscopy
Hanlon, E. B., Manoharan, R., Koo, T.-W., Shafer, K. E., Motz, J. T., Fitzmaurice, M., Kramer, J. R., Itzkan, I., Dasari, R. R., & Feld, M. S. (2000) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/201 · Cited by 894
Near‐infrared Raman spectroscopy for the classification of epithelial pre‐cancers and cancers
Stone, N., Kendall, C., Shepherd, N., Crow, P., & Barr, H. (2002) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.882 · Cited by 472
Raman Spectroscopy Detects Biochemical Changes Due to Proliferation in Mammalian Cell Cultures
Short, K. W., Carpenter, S., Freyer, J. P., & Mourant, J. R. (2005) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.103.038604 · Cited by 286
Erzina, M., Trelin, A., Guselnikova, O., Dvorankova, B., Strnadova, K., Perminova, A., Ulbrich, P., Mares, D., Jerabek, V., Elashnikov, R., et al. (2020) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2020.127660 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahadevan‐Jansen, A., Mitchell, M. F., Ramanujamf, N., Malpica, A., Thomsen, S., Utzinger, U., & Richards‐Kortumt, R.
- Venue
- Photochemistry and Photobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-132
- ISSN
- 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-1097
- OpenAlex
- W2092060883
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Near‐Infrared Raman Spectroscopy for In Vitro Detection of Cervical Precancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb03262.x
- The paper
- Mahadevan‐Jansen, A., Mitchell, M. F., Ramanujamf, N., Malpica, A., Thomsen, S., Utzinger, U., & Richards‐Kortumt, R. (1998). Near‐Infrared Raman Spectroscopy for In Vitro Detection of Cervical Precancers. Photochemistry and Photobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb03262.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.