The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence Diagrams for Causal Modelling and Inference
Abstract
Summary We consider a variety of ways in which probabilistic and causal models can be represented in graphical form. By adding nodes to our graphs to represent parameters, decision,etc., we obtain a generalisation of influence diagrams that supports meaningful causal modelling and inference, and only requires concepts and methods that are already standard in the purely probabilistic case. We relate our representations to others, particularly functional models, and present arguments and examples in favour of their superiority.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The unification of the graphical, potential outcome, structural equations, decision analytical (Dawid, 2002), interventional (Woodward, 2003), sufficient component (Rothman, 1976) and probabilistic (Suppes, 1970) approaches to causation; with each approach viewed as a restricted version of the SCM.”
From Causal inference in statistics: An overview (2009) · cites this paper as Dawid, 2002
Citations
Cites
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
Anderson, N. H. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410600004-24 · Cited by 6,939
The Foundations of Statistics.
Good, I. J., & Savage, L. J. (1955) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343133 · Cited by 4,764
Causation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9 · Cited by 4,617
Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization
Rubin, D. B. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344064 · Cited by 2,503
Robins, J. (1986) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6 · Cited by 2,451
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 4×
“Fairly general sufficient conditions for estimability are given by Galles & Pearl (1995). but it is not known whether or not these are also necessary.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialProceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Meek, C., Chickering, M., & Halpern, J. Y. (2004) · Cited by 1,548
Equivalence and Synthesis of Causal Models
Verma, T., & Pearl, J. (1990) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3501714.3501732 · Cited by 1,542
Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory
Dawid, A. P. (1979) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01052.x · Cited by 1,507
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Balke A.A., 1994, Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, 46
- Dawid A.P., 2002, Discussion of Lauritzen & Richardson (2002), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64
- Frydenberg M., 1990, The chain graph Markov property, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 17, 333
- Nilsson D., 2000, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, 436
- Pearl J., 2000, Causality
- Pearl J., 1995, Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 444
- Raiffa H., 1968, Decision Analysis
- Robins J.M., 1989, Health Service Research Methodology: A Focus on Aids, 113
- Studeny M.(2001).On non‐graphical description of models of conditional independence structure. Paper presented at HSSS Workshop on Stochastic Systems for Individual Behaviours 22–23 January 2001 Louvain la Neuve Belgium.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Causal inference in statistics: An overview
Pearl, J. (2009) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/09-ss057 · Cited by 2,336
“The unification of the graphical, potential outcome, structural equations, decision analytical (Dawid, 2002), interventional (Woodward, 2003), sufficient component (Rothman, 1976) and probabilistic (Suppes, 1970) ap-”
BackgroundMendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
Didelez, V., & Sheehan, N. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206077743 · Cited by 923
An Introduction to Causal Inference
Pearl, J. (2010) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1203 · Cited by 755
Bayesian networks in reliability
Helge Langseth, A., & Portinale, L. (2006) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.037 · Cited by 572
A New Criterion for Confounder Selection
VanderWeele, T. J., & Shpitser, I. (2011) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01619.x · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawid, A. P.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dawid, A. P.
- ORCID
- Dawid, A. P.
- Venue
- International Statistical Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-189
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-5823
- OpenAlex
- W2169315100
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Statistical Review (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- influence diagrams, causal models, causal inference, probabilistic graphical models, decision models, functional model, decision analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review