Cited by 13Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Sex differences in short-term heart rate variability in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension

Open access
Pavithran, Purushothaman, Madanmohan, Trakroo, Nandeesha, Hanumanthappa·2008·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

The authors report the results of the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) indices during 5 minutes of supine rest and 5 minutes of standing and conventional indices of autonomic function in 69 men and 51 women with untreated newly diagnosed hypertension matched for body mass index and resting blood pressure. Mean RR interval, standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals, low-frequency RR spectral power, HRV during deep breathing at 6 breaths per minute, and the 30:15 ratio (maximum RR interval 30th beat/minimum RR interval 15th beat) were significantly lower in women (P=.01, .02, .001, .04, .01, respectively) compared with men. Low frequency RR in normalized units was lower in women in the supine position alone (P=.03). HRV was significantly lower in women with untreated newly diagnosed hypertension compared with men. The authors interpret these results as indicating an increase in baseline cardiac sympathovagal balance in female hypertensive patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.00052.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hogarth AJ, Mackintosh AF, Mary DA. Gender difference in the sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive in normal sub- jects. Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;112:353-361.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavithran, P., Madanmohan, T., & Nandeesha, H.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
904-910
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W1990359346
Cited by
13
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
heart rate variability, sex differences, essential hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension, autonomic function, sympathovagal balance, RR interval, deep breathing, supine rest, standing posture
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Function Tests, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, India, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Prospective Studies, Rest, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Supine Position

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review