Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Further Characterisation of the 91500 Zircon Crystal

Open access
Wiedenbeck, Michael, Hanchar, John M., Peck, William H., Sylvester, Paul, Valley, John, Whitehouse, Martin, Kronz, Andreas, Morishita, Yuichi, Nasdala, Lutz, Fiebig, J., Franchi, I., Girard, J.‐P., Greenwood, R.C., Hinton, R., Kita, N., Mason, P.R.D., Norman, M., Ogasawara, M., Piccoli, P.M., Rhede, D., Satoh, H., Schulz‐Dobrick, B., Skår, O., Spicuzza, MJ., Terada, K., Tindle, A., Togashi, S., Vennemann, T., Xie, Q., Zheng, Y.‐F.·2004·Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

Abstract

This paper reports the results from a second characterisation of the 91500 zircon, including data from electron probe microanalysis, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser fluorination analyses. The focus of this initiative was to establish the suitability of this large single zircon crystal for calibrating in situ analyses of the rare earth elements and oxygen isotopes, as well as to provide working values for key geochemical systems. In addition to extensive testing of the chemical and structural homogeneity of this sample, the occurrence of banding in 91500 in both backscattered electron and cathodoluminescence images is described in detail. Blind intercomparison data reported by both LA‐ICP‐MS and SIMS laboratories indicate that only small systematic differences exist between the data sets provided by these two techniques. Furthermore, the use of NIST SRM 610 glass as the calibrant for SIMS analyses was found to introduce little or no systematic error into the results for zircon. Based on both laser fluorination and SIMS data, zircon 91500 seems to be very well suited for calibrating in situ oxygen isotopic analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb01041.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,519

Metadata

Authors
Wiedenbeck, M., Hanchar, J. M., Peck, W. H., Sylvester, P., Valley, J., Whitehouse, M., Kronz, A., Morishita, Y., Nasdala, L., Fiebig, J., Franchi, I., Girard, J. ‐., Greenwood, R. C., Hinton, R., Kita, N., Mason, P. R. D., Norman, M., Ogasawara, M., Piccoli, P. M., Rhede, D., Satoh, H., Schulz‐Dobrick, B., Skår, O., Spicuzza, M., Terada, K., Tindle, A., Togashi, S., Vennemann, T., Xie, Q., & Zheng, Y. ‐.
Venue
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
9-39
ISSN
  • 0150-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1639-4488
  • 1751-908X
OpenAlex
W2008072085
Cited by
1,519
References
1
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further Characterisation of the 91500 Zircon Crystal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb01041.x
The paper
Wiedenbeck, M., Hanchar, J. M., Peck, W. H., Sylvester, P., Valley, J., Whitehouse, M., Kronz, A., Morishita, Y., Nasdala, L., Fiebig, J., Franchi, I., Girard, J. ‐., Greenwood, R. C., Hinton, R., Kita, N., Mason, P. R. D., Norman, M., Ogasawara, M., Piccoli, P. M., . . . Zheng, Y. ‐. (2004). Further Characterisation of the 91500 Zircon Crystal. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb01041.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.