The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of Reference Values for NIST SRM 610–617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines
Abstract
We present new reference values for the NIST SRM 610–617 glasses following ISO guidelines and the International Association of Geoanalysts’ protocol. Uncertainties at the 95% confidence level (CL) have been determined for bulk‐ and micro‐analytical purposes. In contrast to former compilation procedures, this approach delivers data that consider present‐day requirements of data quality. New analytical data and the nearly complete data set of the GeoReM database were used for this study. Data quality was checked by the application of the Horwitz function and by a careful investigation of analytical procedures. We have determined quantitatively possible element inhomogeneities using different test portion masses of 1, 0.1 and 0.02 μg. Although avoiding the rim region of the glass wafers, we found moderate inhomogeneities of several chalcophile/siderophile elements and gross inhomogeneities of Ni, Se, Pd and Pt at small test portion masses. The extent of inhomogeneity was included in the determination of uncertainties. While the new reference values agree with the NIST certified values with the one exception of Mn in SRM 610, they typically differ by as much as 10% from the Pearce et al. (1997) values in current use. In a few cases (P, S, Cl, Ta, Re) the discrepancies are even higher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearce, N. J. G., Perkins, W. T., Westgate, J. A., Gorton, M. P., Jackson, S. E., Neal, C. R., & Chenery, S. P. (1997) · Geostandards Newsletter · doi:10.1111/j.1751-908x.1997.tb00538.x · Cited by 2,788
GeoReM: A New Geochemical Database for Reference Materials and Isotopic Standards
Jochum, K. P., Nohl, U., Herwig, K., et al. (2005) · Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research · doi:10.1111/j.1751-908x.2005.tb00904.x · Cited by 1,452
Self-citationJochum, K. P., Stoll, B., Herwig, K., Willbold, M., Hofmann, A. W., Amini, M., Aarburg, S., Abouchami, W., Hellebrand, E., Mocek, B., et al. (2006) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2005gc001060 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationConsensus Values and Weighting Factors
Paule, R. C., & Mandel, J. (1982) · Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards · doi:10.6028/jres.087.022 · Cited by 572
Introduction to Geochemical Modeling
Albarède, F. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622960 · Cited by 517
Smithsonian Microbeam Standards
JAROSEWICH, E. (2002) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.107.054 · Cited by 177
Nebel, O., Morel, M. L. A., & Vroon, P. Z. (2009) · Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research · doi:10.1111/j.1751-908x.2009.00032.x · Cited by 93
The uncertainty budget of the multi-element analysis of glasses using LA-ICP-MS
Luo, Y., Gao, S., Longerich, H. P., Günther, D., Wunderli, S., Yuan, H., & Liu, X. (2006) · Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · doi:10.1039/b608010c · Cited by 53
Self-citationPrecision in analytical measurements: Expected values and consequences in geochemical analyses
Horwitz, W., & Albert, R. H. (1995) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00322724 · Cited by 46
Morgan, J. W. (1987) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(87)90135-9 · Cited by 44
Cited by
Lin, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, Z. (2016) · Solid Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sesci.2016.04.002 · Cited by 363
Hydrothermal enrichment of lithium in intracaldera illite-bearing claystones
Benson, T. R., Coble, M. A., & Dilles, J. H. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh8183 · Cited by 147
Earth’s oldest stable crust in the Pilbara Craton formed by cyclic gravitational overturns
Wiemer, D., Schrank, C. E., Murphy, D. T., Wenham, L., & Allen, C. M. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0105-9 · Cited by 124
Robbins, L. J., Lalonde, S. V., Saito, M. A., Planavsky, N. J., Mloszewska, A. M., Pecoits, E., Scott, C., Dupont, C. L., Kappler, A., & Konhauser, K. O. (2013) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12036 · Cited by 79
Lenz, C., Jilbert, T., Conley, D. J., Wolthers, M., & Slomp, C. P. (2015) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-12-4875-2015 · Cited by 61
“LA-ICP-MS data for each element were calibrated by reference to the sensitivities (counts/ppm) of the glass standard NIST SRM 610 (Jochum et al., 2011) and corrected for the natural abundances of the analysed isotopes.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Jochum, K. P., Weis, U., Stoll, B., Kuzmin, D., Yang, Q., Raczek, I., Jacob, D. E., Stracke, A., Birbaum, K., Frick, D. A., Günther, D., & Enzweiler, J.
- Venue
- Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-429
- ISSN
- 0150-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 1639-4488
- 1751-908X
- OpenAlex
- W2085064498
- Cited by
- 2,112
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 40.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Reference Values for NIST SRM 610–617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2011.00120.x
- The paper
- Jochum, K. P., Weis, U., Stoll, B., Kuzmin, D., Yang, Q., Raczek, I., Jacob, D. E., Stracke, A., Birbaum, K., Frick, D. A., Günther, D., & Enzweiler, J. (2011). Determination of Reference Values for NIST SRM 610–617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2011.00120.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
