Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BEST PRACTICE IN COUPLE RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION

Halford, W. Kim, Markman, Howard J., Kling, Galena H., Stanley, Scott M.·2003·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Abstract

Relationship education is widely available to couples and is intended to reduce the prevalence of relationship distress, divorce, and the associated personal and social costs. To realize the potential benefits of couple relationship education, it needs to be evidence‐based, offered in ways that attract couples at high‐risk for relationship problems, and focused on factors that put couples at high‐risk for future relationship problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 115 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kling, G. H., & Stanley, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
385-406
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
OpenAlex
W1997721439
Cited by
310
References
115
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BEST PRACTICE IN COUPLE RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x
The paper
Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kling, G. H., & Stanley, S. M. (2003). BEST PRACTICE IN COUPLE RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.