CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 195Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: A comparison with two other treatment conditions

Open access
Bodenmann, Guy, Cina, Annette, Ledermann, Thomas, Sanders, Matthew R.·2008·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an evidence-based parenting program (the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program), intending to improve parenting skills and children's well-being. Parents participating in a Group Triple P program (n=50 couples) were compared with parents of a non-treated control group (n=50 couples) and parents participating in a marital distress prevention program (couples coping enhancement training (CCET)) (n=50 couples). The two major goals of this study were (a) to evaluate the efficacy of Triple P compared with the two other treatment conditions over a time-span of 1 year and (b) to answer the question whether this program that was developed in Australia is culturally accepted by Swiss parents. Results revealed that Triple P was effective with Swiss families. Mothers of the Triple P group showed significant improvements in parenting, parenting self-esteem, and a decrease in stressors related to parenting. Women trained in Triple P also reported significantly lower rates of child's misbehavior than women of the two other conditions. However, in men only a few significant results were found. Positive effects of the relationship training (CCET) were somewhat lower than those for the Triple P. These findings are further discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.001

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to increase parental confidence and self-efficacy.

    “In a range of settings, brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to reduce parental stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, increase parental confidence and self-efficacy, and reinforce positive parenting behaviors (Bloomfield and Kendall, 2012, Bodenmann et al., 2008, Warner et al., 2011, Zand et al., 2018).”

    From Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention for Parents With Emotional Disorder Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Example (2021) · cites this paper as Bodenmann et al., 2008

  • Brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to reduce parental stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.

    “In a range of settings, brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to reduce parental stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, increase parental confidence and self-efficacy, and reinforce positive parenting behaviors (Bloomfield and Kendall, 2012, Bodenmann et al., 2008, Warner et al., 2011, Zand et al., 2018).”

    From Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention for Parents With Emotional Disorder Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Example (2021) · cites this paper as Bodenmann et al., 2008

  • Brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to reinforce positive parenting behaviors.

    “In a range of settings, brief, parent-focused interventions have been shown to reduce parental stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, increase parental confidence and self-efficacy, and reinforce positive parenting behaviors (Bloomfield and Kendall, 2012, Bodenmann et al., 2008, Warner et al., 2011, Zand et al., 2018).”

    From Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention for Parents With Emotional Disorder Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Example (2021) · cites this paper as Bodenmann et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bodenmann, G., Cina, A., Ledermann, T., & Sanders, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Bodenmann, Guy
ORCID
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
411-427
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.001
OpenAlex
W2154897217
Cited by
195
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2014-12-01)
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, parent training, child behavior problems, parental stress, cultural acceptability, child well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Parents, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Evaluation, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review