The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TURBIDITY SUSPENI)ED SEDIMENT, AND WATER CLARITY: A REVIEW1
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Suspended sediment causes a range of environmental damage, including benthic smothering, irritation of fish gills, and transport of sorbed contaminants. Much of the impact, while sediment remains suspended, is related to its light attenuation, which reduces visual range in water and light availability for photosynthesis. Thus measurement of the optical attributes of suspended matter in many instances is more relevant than measurement of its mass concentration. Nephelometric turbidity, an index of light scattering by suspended particles, has been widely used as a simple, cheap, instrumental surrogate for suspended sediment, that also relates more directly than mass concentration to optical effects of suspended matter. However, turbidity is only a relative measure of scattering (versus arbitrary standards) that has no intrinsic environmental relevance until calibrated to a ‘proper’ scientific quantity. Visual clarity (measured as Secchi or black disc visibility) is a preferred optical quantity with immediate environmental relevance to aesthetics, contact recreation, and fish habitat. Contrary to common perception, visual clarity measurement is not particularly subjective and is more precise than turbidity measurement. Black disc visibility is inter‐convertible with beam attenuation, a fundamental optical quantity that can be monitored continuously by beam transmissometry. Visual clarity or beam attenuation should supplant nephelometric turbidity in many water quality applications, including environmental standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of remote sensing applications for water security: Quantity, quality, and extremes
Chawla, I., Karthikeyan, L., & Mishra, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124826 · Cited by 363
Lawler, D. M., Petts, G. E., Foster, I. D. L., & Harper, S. (2006) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.032 · Cited by 342
Soil erosion from agriculture and mining: A threat to tropical stream ecosystems
Wantzen, K., & Mol, J. (2013) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture3040660 · Cited by 161
Ibrahim, A., Sadiku, S. O. E., Robertson-Andersson, D. V., & Okpeku, M. (2026) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-026-15681-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies‐Colley, R. J., & Smith, D. G.
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1085-1101
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W2039002972
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TURBIDITY SUSPENI)ED SEDIMENT, AND WATER CLARITY: A REVIEW1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03624.x
- The paper
- Davies‐Colley, R. J., & Smith, D. G. (2001). TURBIDITY SUSPENI)ED SEDIMENT, AND WATER CLARITY: A REVIEW1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03624.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.