The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC BENEFITS OF INFILTRATION BASED URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1
Abstract
ABSTRACT: As watersheds are urbanized, their surfaces are made less pervious and more channelized, which reduces infiltration and speeds up the removal of excess runoff. Traditional storm water management seeks to remove runoff as quickly as possible, gathering excess runoff in detention basins for peak reduction where necessary. In contrast, more recently developed “low impact” alternatives manage rainfall where it falls, through a combination of enhancing infiltration properties of pervious areas and rerouting impervious runoff across pervious areas to allow an opportunity for infiltration. In this paper, we investigate the potential for reducing the hydrologic impacts of urbanization by using infiltration based, low impact storm water management. We describe a group of preliminary experiments using relatively simple engineering tools to compare three basic scenarios of development: an undeveloped landscape; a fully developed landscape using traditional, high impact storm water management; and a fully developed landscape using infiltration based, low impact design. Based on these experiments, it appears that by manipulating the layout of urbanized landscapes, it is possible to reduce impacts on hydrology relative to traditional, fully connected storm water systems. However, the amount of reduction in impact is sensitive to both rainfall event size and soil texture, with greatest reductions being possible for small, relatively frequent rainfall events and more pervious soil textures. Thus, low impact techniques appear to provide a valuable tool for reducing runoff for the events that see the greatest relative increases from urbanization: those generated by the small, relatively frequent rainfall events that are small enough to produce little or no runoff from pervious surfaces, but produce runoff from impervious areas. However, it is clear that there still needs to be measures in place for flood management for larger, more intense, and relatively rarer storm events, which are capable of producing significant runoff even for undeveloped basins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics
Qin, H.-P., Li, Z.-X., & Fu, G. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026 · Cited by 552
Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention Media: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., & Minami, C. (2006) · Water Environment Research · doi:10.2175/106143005x94376 · Cited by 464
Urban Stormwater Runoff: A New Class of Environmental Flow Problem
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., & Burns, M. J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045814 · Cited by 358
Loperfido, J. V., Noe, G. B., Jarnagin, S. T., & Hogan, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 · Cited by 204
Jefferson, A. J., Bhaskar, A. S., Hopkins, K. G., Fanelli, R., Avellaneda, P. M., & McMillan, S. K. (2017) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.11347 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Holman‐Dodds, J. K., Bradley, A. A., & Potter, K. W.
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-215
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W2086485770
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC BENEFITS OF INFILTRATION BASED URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb01572.x
- The paper
- Holman‐Dodds, J. K., Bradley, A. A., & Potter, K. W. (2003). EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC BENEFITS OF INFILTRATION BASED URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb01572.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.