Cited by 204Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil erosion and sediment transport

Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale

Loperfido, J.V., Noe, Gregory B., Jarnagin, S. Taylor, Hogan, Dianna M.·2014·Journal of Hydrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban stormwater introduces ecologically relevant quantities of many target pollutants, including nutrients (N and P), heavy metals, herbicides, personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and several plasticizers and common industrial chemicals.

    “urban stormwater introduces ecologically relevant quantities of many target pollutants (United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2010; Loperfido et al. 2014) including nutrients (N and P), heavy metals, herbicides, personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and several plasticizers and common industrial chemicals”
  • Urban stormwater contributes 16% of total sediment, 8% of nitrogen, and 15% of phosphorus loads to Chesapeake Bay.

    “urban stormwater contributes 16%, 8%, and 15% of the total sediment, N, and P loads to the Chesapeake Bay respectively”
  • These urban stormwater contributions to Chesapeake Bay are biologically relevant and much higher than expected given that urban areas comprise about 8.8% of the bay's drainage area.

    “which are biologically relevant amounts and much higher than expected given that urban areas (as defined by the census) comprise about 8.8% of the Chesapeake Bay's drainage area”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loperfido, J. V., Noe, G. B., Jarnagin, S. T., & Hogan, D. M.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Loperfido, J.V.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
519
Pages
2584-2595
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030294376
Cited by
204
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hydrology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
stormwater best management practices, baseflow, impervious cover, forest cover, catchment hydrology, stormflow, heavy rainfall, stormwater management, riparian buffers, Chesapeake Bay watershed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review