The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT
Abstract
The separation of the base flow component from a varying streamflow hydrograph is called “hydrograph analysis.” In this study, two digital filter based separation modules, the BFLOW and Eckhardt filters, were incorporated into the Web based Hydrograph Analysis Tool (WHAT) system. A statistical component was also developed to provide fundamental information for flow frequency analysis and time series analysis. The Web Geographic Information System (GIS) version of the WHAT system accesses and uses U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) daily streamflow data from the USGS web server. The results from the Eckhardt filter method were compared with the results from the BFLOW filter method that was previously validated, since measured base flow data were not available for this study. Following validation, the two digital filter methods in the WHAT system were run for 50 Indiana gaging stations. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient values comparing the results of the two digital filter methods were over 0.91 for all 50 gaging stations, suggesting the filtered base flow using the Eckhardt filter method will typically match measured base flow. Manual separation of base flow from streamflow can lead to inconsistency in the results, while the WHAT system provides consistent results in less than a minute. Although base flow separation algorithms in the WHAT system cannot consider reservoir release and snowmelt that can affect stream hydrographs, the Web based WHAT system provides an efficient tool for hydrologic model calibration and validation. The base flow information from the WHAT system can also play an important role for sustainable ground water and surface water exploitation, including irrigation and industrial uses, and estimation of pollutant loading from both base flow and direct runoff. Thus, best management practices can be appropriately applied to reduce and intercept pollutant leaching if base flow contributes significant amounts of pollutants to the stream. This Web GIS based system also demonstrates how remote, distributed resources can be shared through the Internet using Web programming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation
Eckhardt, K. (2005) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5675 · Cited by 1,006
AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS1
Arnold, J. G., & Allen, P. M. (1999) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03599.x · Cited by 802
Hydrology and floodplain analysis
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2736 · Cited by 765
Automated Base Flow Separation and Recession Analysis Techniques
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., Muttiah, R., & Bernhardt, G. (1995) · Groundwater · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00046.x · Cited by 612
HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis
(1996) · doi:10.3133/wri964040 · Cited by 503
Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin
Arnold, J. G., Muttiah, R. S., Srinivasan, R., & Allen, P. M. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00139-0 · Cited by 462
A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation
Chapman, T. (1999) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(19990415)13:5<701::aid-hyp774>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 444
INTEGRATION OF A BASIN‐SCALE WATER QUALITY MODEL WITH GIS1
Srinivasan, R., & Arnold, J. G. (1994) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03304.x · Cited by 344
Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation
Wittenberg, H., & Sivapalan, M. (1999) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00040-2 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., & Carrillo, G. (2011) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011 · Cited by 549
Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale
Ahiablame, L., & Shakya, R. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.036 · Cited by 317
Loperfido, J. V., Noe, G. B., Jarnagin, S. T., & Hogan, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 · Cited by 204
Giese, E., Rockler, A., Shirmohammadi, A., & Pavao-Zuckerman, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001099 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, K. J., Engel, B. A., Tang, Z., Choi, J., Kim, K.-S., Muthukrishnan, S., & Tripathy, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1407-1416
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W2146558288
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03808.x
- The paper
- Lim, K. J., Engel, B. A., Tang, Z., Choi, J., Kim, K.-S., Muthukrishnan, S., & Tripathy, D. (2005). AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03808.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.