Follow‐Up Preventive Dental Visits for Medicaid‐Enrolled Children in the Medical Office
Abstract
Objective: To describe the frequency and determinants of follow‐up preventive oral health visits at medical offices among children screened for dental disease, receiving fluoride varnish and counseling. Methods: Parents of Medicaid children enrolled in a clinical trial completed a baseline questionnaire before their child's medical visit. The providers completed patient dental encounter forms at each visit, documenting dental services, caries risk, and dental disease. Questionnaires, encounter forms, and Medicaid claims were linked to create a database with information on visits, child and caregiver characteristics, and oral health practices. Descriptive and multivariate analyses assessed associations of variables with likelihood of follow‐up visits. Results: A total of 744 children with mean age of 15 months at enrollment had 1,415 oral health visits. Children averaged 0.9 follow‐up oral health visits and 1.3 follow‐up well‐child visits. Fewer children had follow‐up oral health visits (55 percent) than well‐child visits (70 percent), but children with a baseline preventive dental visit at a younger age had more visits with shorter intervals. Caregivers reporting greater numbers of children and putting the child to bed with the bottle had more subsequent visits. Older age of child, male child, and caregiver education ≤12 years were associated with fewer follow‐up visits. Conclusions: Children with preventive dental services in medical offices have similar numbers of oral health and well‐child visits, with both below recommended numbers. Strategies to increase these services may need to be tied to those aimed at increasing compliance with well‐child visits, taking advantage of nonwell‐child visits, and implementing Medicaid policies that allow for optimal timing of visits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence is lacking on how often dental referral activities occur within primary care and on their effectiveness.
“Evidence is lacking on the extent to which these activities take place within primary care or their effectiveness.12, 25”
From Access to preventive services after the integration of oral health care into early childhood education and medical care (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?
Yarnall, K. S. H., Pollak, K. I., Østbye, T., Krause, K. M., & Michener, J. L. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.635 · Cited by 1,641 · see citing works
Rozier, R. G., Sutton, B. K., Bawden, J. W., Haupt, K., Slade, G. D., & King, R. S. (2003) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03674.x · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationFluoride Varnish Use in Primary Care: What Do Providers Think?
Lewis, C., Lynch, H., & Richardson, L. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1330 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgette, J. M., Preisser, J. S., & Rozier, R. G. (2018) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.019 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Quiñonez, R. B., Pahel, B. T., Rozier, R. G., & Stearns, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Quiñonez, Rocio Beatriz
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health Dentistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 131-138
- ISSN
- 0022-4006 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7325
- OpenAlex
- W2028789175
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Health Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (ORS 2974-00)
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE013949, R03DE017350)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Keywords
- preventive dental visits, follow-up visit frequency, fluoride varnish, oral health counseling, caries risk, well-child visits, bottle feeding, caregiver education, oral health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Attitude to Health, Bottle Feeding, Child Health Services, Dental Caries Susceptibility, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Dental, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Medicaid, Oral Hygiene, Parents, Preventive Dentistry, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Caregivers, Dental Care for Children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review