Cited by 160Dental Health and Care UtilizationChild and Adolescent HealthDental Education, Practice, Research

Prevention of Early Childhood Caries in North Carolina Medical Practices: Implications for Research and Practice>

Rozier, R. Gary, Sutton, Betty King, Bawden, James W., Haupt, Kelly, Slade, Gary D., King, Rebecca S.·2003·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Early childhood caries is a significant public health problem in low-income children, with important negative consequences for the child and the family. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development, implementation, and preliminary outcomes of preventive dentistry programs in North Carolina that target low-income children from birth to thirty-five months of age. The focus is on Into the Mouths of Babes, a statewide program in which pediatricians, family physicians, and providers in community health clinics are reimbursed by Medicaid to provide preventive dental services for children (risk assessment, screening, referral, fluoride varnish application) and caregivers (counseling). The provider intervention includes continuing medical education lectures and interactive sessions, practice guidelines for the patient interventions, case-based problems, practical strategies for implementation, a toolkit with resource materials, and follow-up training. In the first two years of the statewide program, 1,595 medical providers have been trained. The number of providers billing for these services has steadily increased, and by the last quarter of 2002, the number of visits in which preventive dental services were provided in medical offices reached 10,875. A total of 38,056 preventive dental visits occurred in medical offices in 2002. By the end of 2002, only sixteen of the state's one hundred counties had no pediatrician, family physician, or local health department participating. The preliminary results from this program demonstrate that nondental professionals can integrate preventive dental services into their practices. The program has increased access to preventive dental services for young Medicaid children whose access to dentists is restricted. Assessments of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both the provider and patient interventions are under way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03674.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies showed that solo practices and practices with specific clienteles such as infants and toddlers had lower referral rates to dentists than polyclinics with various clienteles.

    “Some studies showed that solo practices and practices with specific clienteles such as infants and toddlers had lower referral rates to dentists than polyclinics with various clienteles.”
  • According to some studies in North Carolina and Peru, primary care physicians and nurses were able to identify their role and assumed responsibility in taking care of oral health of their patients.

    “According to some studies conducted in North Carolina and Peru, primary care physicians and nurses were able to identify their role and assumed their responsibility in taking care of the oral health of their patients.”
  • Training of paediatricians, family and primary care physicians and community health providers in a preventive dentistry programme in North Carolina, Seattle and Washington led to integration of preventive dental services into their practices.

    “Training of paediatricians, family and primary care physicians and community health providers in a preventive dentistry programme in North Carolina (Into the Mouths of Babes), in Seattle (Kids Get Care) and in Washington led to the integration of preventive dental services into their practices.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozier, R. G., Sutton, B. K., Bawden, J. W., Haupt, K., Slade, G. D., & King, R. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Slade, Gary D.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
876-885
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W4297835309
Cited by
160
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE013949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
early childhood caries, preventive dentistry, Medicaid, low-income children, fluoride varnish, dental caries screening, risk assessment, caregiver counseling, continuing medical education, access to dental care, North Carolina
MeSH terms
Cariostatic Agents, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Susceptibility, Education, Medical, Continuing, Fluorides, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mass Screening, Medicaid, North Carolina, Referral and Consultation, United States, Program Development, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review