Cited by 11Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Infertility in Australia circa 1980: an historical population perspective on the uptake of fertility treatment by Australian women born in 1946-51

Open access
Herbert, Danielle L., Lucke, Jayne C., Dobson, Annette J.·2009·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of lifetime infertility in Australian women born in 1946-51 and examine their uptake of treatment. METHODS: Participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health born in 1946-51 (n=13,715) completed up to four mailed surveys from 1996 to 2004. The odds of infertility were estimated using logistic regression with adjustment for socio-demographic and reproductive factors. RESULTS: Among participants, 92.1% had been pregnant. For women who had been pregnant (n=12738): 56.5% had at least one birth but no pregnancy loss (miscarriage and/or termination); 39.9% experienced both birth and loss; and 3.6% had a loss only. The lifetime prevalence of infertility was 11.0%. Among women who reported infertility (n=1511), 41.7% used treatment. Women had higher odds of infertility when they had reproductive histories of losses only (OR range 9.0-43.5) or had never been pregnant (OR=15.7, 95%CI 11.8-20.8); and higher odds for treatment: losses only (OR range 2.5-9.8); or never pregnant (1.96, 1.28-3.00). Women who delayed their first birth until aged 30+ years had higher odds of treatment (OR range 3.2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: About one in ten women experienced infertility and almost half used some form of treatment, especially those attempting pregnancy after 1980. Older first time mothers had an increased uptake of treatment as assisted reproductive technologies (ART) developed. IMPLICATIONS: This study provided evidence of the early uptake of treatment prior to 1979 when the national register of invasive ART was developed and later uptake prior to 1998 when data on non-invasive ART were first collected.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00445.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors.

    “Since women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from those women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors (Farland, under review for publication) (10–18) additional analyses of infertility type were conducted using male factor infertility as the reference group.”

    From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Assisted Reproductive Technologies Review Committee. Independent Review of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Canberra (AUST): Department of Health and Ageing; 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herbert, D. L., Lucke, J. C., & Dobson, A. J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Herbert, Danielle L.
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
507-514
ISSN
1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1484797165
Cited by
11
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
infertility, assisted reproduction, miscarriage, abortion, Australian women, Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Birth Rate, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Infertility, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, History, 20th Century, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review