The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue
Open accessAbstract
Two cultivars of Vitis vinifera L., namely Grenache and Shiraz, have been described as having near-isohydric and near-anisohydric responses respectively to soil water stress (Schultz, Plant Cell and Environment, 26, 1393–1405, 2003). Given that contrast in sensitivity to soil water, a question arises as to whether atmospheric moisture stress will elicit similar differences. The present study was undertaken to investigate this issue by comparing stomatal responses in these same two cultivars to contrasting vapour pressure deficit (VPD). Test material included field grape vines in the Barossa Valley and pot-grown vines under partial shade in Adelaide. Our experiments showed that the same isohydric/anisohydric distinction as described by Schultz (2003) is apparent in leaf responses to atmospheric moisture stress. In the more isohydric cultivar, Grenache, stomatal conductance is more responsive to changes in VPD. This heightened sensitivity (compared with Shiraz) appears to be associated with higher levels of abscisic acid (ABA) in Grenache xylem sap. Expression studies on the key genes in the ABA biosynthetic pathway indicate that regulation of the V.v.nced1 gene expression in leaf tissue, but not in the root tissues, is associated with the changes in the xylem sap ABA. Moreover, the two cultivars (Grenache and Shiraz) differed with respect to both scale and time course of those responses. We conclude that these two Vitis vinifera cultivars do indeed differ significantly in the way that they respond to potentially stressful atmospheric conditions, and that ABA physiology is a key process in these contrasting responses. An understanding of such mechanisms, including the relative importance of roots and shoots in determining vine response to abiotic stress, is highly relevant to irrigation scheduling, and to management of associated variation in vineyard productivity across diverse environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lovisolo, C., Perrone, I., Carra, A., Ferrandino, A., Flexas, J., Medrano, H., & Schubert, A. (2010) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp09191 · Cited by 417
Short-term physiological effects of smoke on grapevine leaves
Bell, T. L., Stephens, S. L., & Moritz, M. A. (2013) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf12140 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- SOAR, C. J., SPEIRS, J., MAFFEI, S. M., PENROSE, A. B., MCCARTHY, M. G., & LOVEYS, B. R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-12
- ISSN
- 1322-7130 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0238
- OpenAlex
- W1969290971
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2006.tb00038.x
- The paper
- SOAR, C. J., SPEIRS, J., MAFFEI, S. M., PENROSE, A. B., MCCARTHY, M. G., & LOVEYS, B. R. (2006). Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2006.tb00038.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.