Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference

Open access
Ezzedine, K., Lim, H. W., Suzuki, T., Katayama, I., Hamzavi, I., Lan, C. C. E., Goh, B. K., Anbar, T., Silva de Castro, C., Lee, A. Y., Parsad, D., van Geel, N., Le Poole, I. C., Oiso, N., Benzekri, L., Spritz, R., Gauthier, Y., Hann, S. K., Picardo, M., Taieb, A., on behalf of the Vitiligo Global Issue Consensus Conference panelists·2012·Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research

Abstract

Summary: During the 2011 International Pigment Cell Conference (IPCC), the Vitiligo European Taskforce (VETF) convened a consensus conference on issues of global importance for vitiligo clinical research. As suggested by an international panel of experts, the conference focused on four topics: classification and nomenclature; definition of stable disease; definition of Koebner’s phenomenon (KP); and ‘autoimmune vitiligo’. These topics were discussed in seven working groups representing different geographical regions. A consensus emerged that segmental vitiligo be classified separately from all other forms of vitiligo and that the term ‘vitiligo’ be used as an umbrella term for all non‐segmental forms of vitiligo, including ‘mixed vitiligo’ in which segmental and non‐segmental vitiligo are combined and which is considered a subgroup of vitiligo. Further, the conference recommends that disease stability be best assessed based on the stability of individual lesions rather than the overall stability of the disease as the latter is difficult to define precisely and reliably. The conference also endorsed the classification of KP for vitiligo as proposed by the VETF (history based, clinical observation based, or experimentally induced). Lastly, the conference agreed that ‘autoimmune vitiligo’ should not be used as a separate classification as published evidence indicates that the pathophysiology of all forms of vitiligo likely involves autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2012.00997.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
Ezzedine, K., Lim, H. W., Suzuki, T., Katayama, I., Hamzavi, I., Lan, C. C. E., Goh, B. K., Anbar, T., Silva de Castro, C., Lee, A. Y., Parsad, D., van Geel, N., Le Poole, I. C., Oiso, N., Benzekri, L., Spritz, R., Gauthier, Y., Hann, S. K., Picardo, M., Taieb, A., & panelists, O. B. O. T. V. G. I. C. C.
Venue
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
E1-13
ISSN
  • 1755-1471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-148X
OpenAlex
W1781577325
Cited by
702
References
1
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-148x.2012.00997.x
The paper
Ezzedine, K., Lim, H. W., Suzuki, T., Katayama, I., Hamzavi, I., Lan, C. C. E., Goh, B. K., Anbar, T., Silva de Castro, C., Lee, A. Y., Parsad, D., van Geel, N., Le Poole, I. C., Oiso, N., Benzekri, L., Spritz, R., Gauthier, Y., Hann, S. K., Picardo, M., . . . panelists, O. B. O. T. V. G. I. C. C. (2012). Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-148x.2012.00997.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.