The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conversation and Coordinative Structures
Open accessAbstract
People coordinate body postures and gaze patterns during conversation. We review literature showing that (1) action embodies cognition, (2) postural coordination emerges spontaneously when two people converse, (3) gaze patterns influence postural coordination, (4) gaze coordination is a function of common ground knowledge and visual information that conversants believe they share, and (5) gaze coordination is causally related to mutual understanding. We then consider how coordination, generally, can be understood as temporarily coupled neuromuscular components that function as a collective unit known as a coordinative structure in the motor control literature. We speculate that the coordination of gaze and body sway found in conversation may be understood as a cross‐person coordinative structure that embodies the goals of the joint action system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801 · cited 4×
“, Kelso, 1995; Turvey, 1990). Proponents of dynamical systems accounts of human performance have offered similar explanations of human motor coordination. For example, self-organized, coordinative structures have been hypothesized to explain interlimb rhythmic coordination (e.g., Fuchs, Jirsa, Haken, & Kelso, 1996). I…”
BackgroundInfluentialClark, H. H. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620539 · Cited by 5,123
Six views of embodied cognition
Wilson, M. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196322 · Cited by 4,782
Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems
MARWAN, N., CARMENROMANO, M., THIEL, M., & KURTHS, J. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001 · Cited by 3,814
Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again.
van Gelder, T., & Clark, A. (1998) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2998391 · Cited by 3,128
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior
(1997) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90151-6 · Cited by 2,839
Using language: Communicative acts
Clark, H. H. (1996) · Cited by 2,721
Using language: Index of names
Clark, H. H. (1996) · Cited by 2,720
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
Cited by
Can social interaction constitute social cognition?
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009 · Cited by 911
Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.016 · Cited by 502
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12009 · Cited by 522
Language style matching in writing: synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry.
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020386 · Cited by 380
Dialog as interpersonal synergy
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R.
- Venue
- Topics in Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-319
- ISSN
- 1756-8757 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-8765
- OpenAlex
- W2110090168
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversation and Coordinative Structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x
- The paper
- Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and Coordinative Structures. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.