Infield greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane soils in Brazil: effects from synthetic and organic fertilizer application and crop trash accumulation
Open accessAbstract
Bioethanol from sugarcane is becoming an increasingly important alternative energy source worldwide as it is considered to be both economically and environmentally sustainable. Besides being produced from a tropical perennial grass with high photosynthetic efficiency, sugarcane ethanol is commonly associated with low N fertilizer use because sugarcane from B razil, the world's largest sugarcane producer, has a low N demand. In recent years, several models have predicted that the use of sugarcane ethanol in replacement to fossil fuel could lead to high greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emission savings. However, empirical data that can be used to validate model predictions and estimates from indirect methodologies are scarce, especially with regard to emissions associated with different fertilization methods and agricultural management practices commonly used in sugarcane agriculture in B razil. In this study, we provide in situ data on emissions of three GHG ( CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 ) from sugarcane soils in B razil and assess how they vary with fertilization methods and management practices. We measured emissions during the two main phases of the sugarcane crop cycle (plant and ratoon cane), which include different fertilization methods and field conditions. Our results show that N 2 O and CO 2 emissions in plant cane varied significantly depending on the fertilization method and that waste products from ethanol production used as organic fertilizers with mineral fertilizer, as it is the common practice in B razil, increase emission rates significantly. Cumulatively, the highest emissions were observed for ratoon cane treated with vinasse (liquid waste from ethanol production) especially as the amount of crop trash on the soil surface increased. Emissions of CO 2 and N 2 O were 6.9 kg ha −1 yr −1 and 7.5 kg ha −1 yr −1 , respectively, totaling about 3000 kg in CO 2 equivalent ha −1 yr −1 .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Crutzen, P. J., Mosier, A. R., Smith, K. A., & Winiwarter, W. (2007) · doi:10.5194/acpd-7-11191-2007 · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification
Burney, J. A., Davis, S. J., & Lobell, D. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914216107 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, M., Han, J., Dunn, J. B., Cai, H., & Elgowainy, A. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045905 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels – A review
Mat Aron, N. S., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Show, P. L., Chen, W., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2020) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.5557 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carmo, J. B. D., Filoso, S., Zotelli, L. C., de Sousa Neto, E. R., Pitombo, L. M., Duarte‐Neto, P. J., Vargas, V. P., Andrade, C. A., Gava, G. J. C., Rossetto, R., Cantarella, H., Neto, A. E., & Martinelli, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Departamento de Ciências Ambientais Universidade Federal de São Carlos campus Sorocaba, Rod. João Leme dos Santos km 110 CEP 18052‐780 Sorocaba Brazil
- University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
- Divisão de Sustentabilidade Instituto Agronômico de Campinas Av. Barão de Itapura 1481 CEP 13020‐902 Campinas Brazil
- Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura Universidade de São Paulo Av. Centenário 303 CEP 13400‐970 Piracicaba Brazil
- Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
- Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (BR)
- Agronomical Institute of Campinas (BR)
- Embrapa (BR)
- Agência Paulista de Tecnologia Polo Jau Rodovia Deputado Leônidas Pacheco Ferreiro km 304 CEP 17201‐970 Jau Brazil
- Agência Paulista de Tecnologia Polo Piracicaba Rodovia SP 127 km 30 CEP 13400‐970 Piracicaba Brazil
- Sugarcane Research Center (Brazil) (BR)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- GCB Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-280
- ISSN
- 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-1707
- OpenAlex
- W2165667973
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Physical Therapy Association
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (08/56147-1, 08/55989-9)
- Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- sugarcane, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, vinasse, organic fertilizer, mineral fertilizers, crop residues, ratoon cane, plant cane, bioethanol, soil emissions, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review