Cited by 136Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale: Measurement Invariance between Canada and France

Brien, Maryse, Forest, Jacques, Mageau, Geneviève A., Boudrias, Jean‐Sébastien, Desrumaux, Pascale, Brunet, Luc, Morin, Estelle M.·2012·Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale (BPNWS) in French, but items are also provided in English in the article. The BPNWS is a work‐related self‐report instrument designed to measure the degree to which the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as identified by Self‐Determination Theory (), are satisfied at work. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the first study examines the structure of the BPNWS in a group of 271 workers. The second study tests the measurement invariance of the scale in a group of 851 teachers from two different cultures, Canada and France. Results support the three‐factor structure and show adequate internal consistency, as well as nomological validity across samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01067.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A variety of Basic Psychological Need scales have been adapted to specific contexts, such as exercise, school, and work.

    “Further, a variety of scales were adapted to specific contexts, such as the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale (Vlachopoulos et al., 2010), the Basic Psychological Needs at School Scale (Tian, Han, & Huebner, 2014), and the Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale (Brien et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brien, M., Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Boudrias, J., Desrumaux, P., Brunet, L., & Morin, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Brien, Maryse
Venue
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
167-187
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W1894412492
Cited by
136
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
basic psychological needs, autonomy, competence, relatedness, self-determination theory, scale validation, measurement invariance, cross-cultural measurement, teachers, employee motivation, French translation
MeSH terms
Optimism, Adult, Aged, Canada, Faculty, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Work, Reproducibility of Results, Workplace, Self Efficacy, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review