Cited by 30Dental Health and Care UtilizationHomelessness and Social IssuesOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Self-reported oral health of a metropolitan homeless population in Australia: comparisons with population-level data

Open access
Parker, EJ, Jamieson, LM, Steffens, MA, Cathro, P, Logan, RM·2011·Australian Dental Journal

Abstract

Background: There is limited information on self‐perceived oral health of homeless populations. This study quantified self‐reported oral health among a metropolitan homeless adult population and compared against a representative sample of the metropolitan adult population obtained from the National Survey of Adult Oral Health. Methods: A total of 248 homeless participants (age range 17–78 years, 79% male) completed a self‐report questionnaire. Data for an age‐matched, representative sample of metropolitan‐dwelling adults were obtained from Australia’s second National Survey of Adult Oral Health. Percentage responses and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, with non‐overlapping 95% confidence intervals used to identify statistically significant differences between the two groups. Results: Homeless adults reported poorer oral health than their age‐matched general population counterparts. Twice as many homeless adults reported visiting a dentist more than a year ago and that their usual reason for dental attendance was for a dental problem. The proportion of homeless adults with a perceived need for fillings or extractions was also twice that of their age‐matched general population counterparts. Three times as many homeless adults rated their oral health as ‘fair’ or ‘poor’. Conclusions: A significantly greater proportion of homeless adults in an Australian metropolitan location reported poorer oral health compared with the general metropolitan adult population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01346.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, E., Jamieson, L., Steffens, M., Cathro, P., & Logan, R.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
Australian Dental Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-28
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
272-277
ISSN
  • 0045-0421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1834-7819
OpenAlex
W1930465371
Cited by
28
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Dental Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
homelessness, oral health, oral health perception, homeless adults, access to dental care, dental attendance, oral health status, population comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Care, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dentition, Educational Status, Ethnicity, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Oral Health, Public Assistance, Sex Factors, Smoking, South Australia, Tooth Extraction, Urban Population, Health Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Needs Assessment, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review