Cited by 255Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental materials and restorationsHealthcare Systems and Reforms

The burden of restorative dental treatment for children in third world countries

Open access
Yee, Robert, Sheiham, Aubrey·2002·International Dental Journal

Abstract

Objective To analyse whether developing countries have sufficient health dollars to treat existing diseases in general and dental caries in particular in their child population.Methods Assessments of the costs of treating existing and future caries by the conventional approach. Analysis of WHO dental databases and spreadsheet calculations of costs based upon population projections, prevalence and trends in patterns of caries.Findings Even though the caries levels are low and most of the disease occurs on the occlusal and the buccal/lingual surfaces, more than 90% of the dental caries remains untreated in Third World countries. Calculations reveal that to restore the permanent dentition of the child population of low-income nations using traditional amalgam restorative dentistry would cost between pounds 1,024 ($US1618) and pounds 2,224 ($US3513) per 1,000 children of mixed ages from 6 to 18 years. This exceeds the available resources for the provision of an essential public health care package for the children of 15 to 29 low-income countries.Conclusions To treat caries with the traditional method of restorative dentistry is beyond the financial capabilities of the majority of low-income nations, as three-quarters of these countries do not even have sufficient resources to finance an essential package of health care services for their children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2002.tb00589.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In low-income countries, the 'western' model of dentistry is unaffordable, unsustainable and inappropriate.

    “This is particularly the case in low-income countries where the 'western' model of dentistry is unaffordable, unsustainable and inappropriate.[6][7][8]”

    From Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. (2019) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) concludes that traditional restorative treatment of children's caries is beyond the financial capabilities of most low-income nations and says prescribing unaffordable treatment where resources are unlikely to become available is unethical. That supports the affordability and appropriateness concerns, but the paper assesses conventional restorative care for children, not the entire ‘western’ model of dentistry or its sustainability in general. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The westernised model of modern dentistry is unaffordable and inappropriate in many LMIC.

    “The 'westernised' model of modern dentistry (high technology and treatment focused) is unaffordable and inappropriate in many LMIC.8”

    From Oral diseases: a global public health challenge (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract concludes that traditional restorative treatment of children's caries is beyond the financial capabilities of most low-income nations. It also says prescribing unaffordable treatment when resources are scarce is unethical. The paper does not establish that the broader, high-technology model of modern dentistry is unaffordable or inappropriate across LMIC. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [3]3. Yee, R. Can third world countries International Dental Journal (2002) Vol. 52/No.l afford to treat dental caries? Is the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique an effective and satisfac- tory solution? Msc. Thesis. London: University of London; 1999
  2. [5]5. Murray C J, Lopez A D. The Global Burden of Disease: Volume 7 . Geneva: World Health Organisation, Harvard School o f Public Health, and the World Bank, 1996. UNICEF. The State ofthe World's Chil- dren 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  3. [9]9. World Bank. World Development Report 1993. Investing in Health. pp.72-107. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  4. [16]16. nient, Environmental Change and Human Health. A joint publication of World Resources Institute, the United Nations Environment Programme, the United Nations Development Programme, the World Bank. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press. http://www.wri.org/ wr-98-991
  5. [19]19. World Bank. Health Priorities and Op- tions in the World Bank's Par@ Mem- bers Countries. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1994.
  6. [26]26. Sheiham A. Oral health policy and pre- vention. I n The Prevention of Oral Dis- ease: 3rd. Edition. Murray J J (ed). pp 234-249. New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1996.
  7. [38]38. Murray C J, Lopez A D. The Global Burden of Disease: Lblume 1 . pp. 541- 576. Geneva: World Health Organisa- tion, Harvard School of Public Health, and the World Bank, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yee, R., & Sheiham, A.
Corresponding author
Yee, Robert
Venue
International Dental Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0020-6539 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060171656
Cited by
255
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Dental Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
dental caries, restorative dentistry, children, low-income countries, health care financing, untreated dental caries, amalgam restorations, permanent teeth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Dental Caries, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Developing Countries, DMF Index, Health Expenditures, Health Resources, Humans, Public Health, Health Care Costs, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review