The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities*
Abstract
Abstract. This paper models the relation between a firm's market value and accounting data concerning operating and financial activities. Book value equals market value for financial activities, but they can differ for operating activities. Market value is assumed to equal the net present value of expected future dividends, and is shown, under clean surplus accounting, to also equal book value plus the net present value of expected future abnormal earnings (which equals accounting earnings minus an interest charge on opening book value). A linear model specifies the dynamics of an information set that includes book value and abnormal earnings for operating activities. Model parameters represent persistence of abnormal earnings, growth, and accounting conservatism. The model is sufficiently simple to permit derivation of closed form expressions relating market value to accounting data and other information. Three kinds of analyses develop from the model. The first set deals with value as it relates to anticipated realizations of accounting data. The second set examines in precise terms how value depends on contemporaneous realizations of accounting data. The third set examines asymptotic relations comparing market value to earnings and book values, and how earnings relate to beginning of period book values. The paper demonstrates that in all three sets of analyses the conclusions hinge on the extent to which the accounting is conservative as opposed to unbiased. Further, the absence/presence of growth in operating activities is relevant if, and only if, the accounting is conservative. Résumé. Les auteurs présentent sous forme de modèle la relation entre la valeur marchande d'une entreprise et les données comptables relatives à ses activités d'exploitation et ses activités financières. La valeur comptable est égale à la valeur marchande lorsqu'il s'agit d'activités financières, mais elle peut être différente dans le cas des activités d'exploitation. Les auteurs supposent que la valeur marchande est égale à la valeur actualisée nette des dividendes futurs prévus et démontrent que, lorsqu'on applique la méthode du résultat global, la valeur marchande est aussi égale à la valeur comptable additionnée de la valeur actualisée nette des bénéfices extraordinaires futurs prévus (qui sont égaux aux bénéfices comptables diminués de frais d'intérêt implicites sur la valeur comptable nette). Un modèle linéaire précise la dynamique d'un ensemble de données, incluant la valeur comptable et les bénéfices extraordinaires, relatives aux activités d'exploitation. Les paramètres du modèle traduisent la persistance des bénéfices extraordinaires, la croissance et le principe de prudence. Le modèle est suffisamment simple pour permettre de dériver des expressions fermées qui mettent en relation la valeur marchande et les données comptables et autres. Du modèle se dégagent trois formes d'analyses. La première porte sur la valeur, dans sa relation avec la matérialisation anticipée des données comptables. La deuxième porte sur l'examen précis du lien entre la valeur et la matérialisation actuelle des données comptables. Enfin, la troisième porte sur l'examen des relations asymptotiques à travers lesquelles se comparent la valeur marchande, d'une part, et les bénéfices et la valeur comptable, d'autre part, ainsi que sur la façon dont les bénéfices se rattachent aux valeurs comptables du début de l'exercice. Les auteurs établissent que dans les trois formes d'analyses, les conclusions s'orientent vers la mesure dans laquelle, dans le domaine comptable, l'accent est mis sur la prudence par opposition à l'impartialité. En outre, l'absence ou la présence de croissance dans les activités d'exploitation n'est pertinente que si et seulement si le principe de prudence est appliqué à la comptabilité.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital.
Botosan, C. A. (1997) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-9709240185 · Cited by 3,436
The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting
Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00029-5 · Cited by 1,742
Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns
Frankel, R., & Lee, C. M. C. (1998) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00026-3 · Cited by 1,082
Conservatism in Accounting Part II: Evidence and Research Opportunities
Watts, R. L. (2003) · Accounting Horizons · doi:10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287 · Cited by 991
Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital
Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00025-3 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- FELTHAM, G. A., & OHLSON, J. A.
- Venue
- Contemporary Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 689-731
- ISSN
- 0823-9150 (ISSN-L)
- 1911-3846
- OpenAlex
- W2130392613
- Cited by
- 2,220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 108.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00462.x
- The paper
- FELTHAM, G. A., & OHLSON, J. A. (1995). Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities*. Contemporary Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00462.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.