Cited by 1,742Accounting Theory and Financial ReportingAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research

The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting

Holthausen, Robert W., Watts, Ross L.·2001·Journal of Accounting and Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00029-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-window returns or value relevance studies do not imply that shareholders learned information from CSR disclosures or responded to them.

    “In contrast, long-window returns or value relevance studies tell us that CSR disclosures and stock returns reflect common information, but do not imply that shareholders learned this information from the CSR disclosures (or responded to them; e.g., Holthausen and Watts 2001).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Holthausen and Watts 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Watts, Ross L.
Venue
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
31
Issue
1-3
Pages
3-75
ISSN
0165-4101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121456122
Cited by
1,742
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 84
FWCI
158.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Accounting and Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Keywords
value relevance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review