The Harvest of Rain–Forest Birds by Indigenous Communities in Panama*
Abstract
In this article I attempt to shed light on the relationships between indigenous communities and bird populations through research on hunting in five neighboring villages in western Panama. Over eight months, 59 households captured 1,584 birds using rifles, sling‐shots, traps, and other methods, resulting in a total yield of 252 kilograms. Although hunters captured more than 125 avian species, just four species account for more than half of the total harvest. The most important game bird is the great curassow (Crax rubra), followed by the great tinamou (Tinamus major) and crested guan (Penelope purpurascens). The type and quantity of avifauna captured varies significantly according to habitat and hunting strategy. The spatial distribution of bird kill sites is highly concentrated, with 62 percent of the harvest by weight captured within just 1 kilometer of the participating households. Even the more vulnerable species are encountered close to home, suggesting that overhunting has not occurred.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Netting and trapping were traditionally carried out using a variety of specialized techniques; but the use of steel wire snares is now prominent in Africa, although often illegal, as the material is inexpensive, durable and strong enough to capture large animals.
“Netting and trapping were traditionally carried out using a variety of specialized techniques (Dounias 1999, Smith 2010); but the use of steel wire snares is now prominent in Africa, although often “illegal”, as the material is inexpensive, durable and strong enough to capture large animals.”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Smith 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Derek A.
- ORCID
- Smith, Derek A.
- Venue
- Geographical Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-203
- ISSN
- 0016-7428 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-0846
- OpenAlex
- W1497432067
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geographical Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- rainforest birds, bird hunting, indigenous peoples, hunting pressure, habitat use, vulnerable species, western Panama
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review