The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
(Anti‐)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell*
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pryor, J. (2000) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00277 · Cited by 1,127
Dretske, F. I. (1970) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024710 · Cited by 1,022
Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge
(2001) · Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality · doi:10.2307/j.ctv22jntgn.20 · Cited by 692
Scepticism and Dreaming: Imploding the Demon
WRIGHT, C. (1991) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/c.397.87 · Cited by 220
Self-citationCogency and Question‐Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey's Paradox and Putnam's Proof
Wright, C. (2000) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1758-2237.2000.tb00018.x · Cited by 191
Self-citationCogency and Question‐Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey's Paradox and Putnam's Proof
Wright, C. (2000) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/0029-4624.34.s1.17 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Cited by
Pritchard, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/019928038x.001.0001 · Cited by 874
What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?
Pryor, J. (2004) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00034.x · Cited by 705
Common Sense as Evidence: Against Revisionary Ontology and Skepticism
KELLY, T. (2008) · Midwest Studies In Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2008.00165.x · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- WRIGHT, C.
- Venue
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 330-348
- ISSN
- 0031-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-1592
- OpenAlex
- W2163032625
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 61.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: (Anti‐)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
- The paper
- WRIGHT, C. (2002). (Anti‐)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell*. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
