The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Researchers' Perspectives on Supply Chain Risk Management
Open accessAbstract
Supply chain risk management (SCRM) is a nascent area emerging from a growing appreciation for supply chain risk by practitioners and by researchers. However, there is diverse perception of research in supply chain risk because these researchers have approached this area from different domains. This paper presents our study of this diversity from the perspectives of operations and supply chain management scholars: First, we reviewed the researchers' output, i.e., the recent research literature. Next, we surveyed two focus groups (members of Supply Chain Thought Leaders and International SCRM groups) with open‐ended questions. Finally, we surveyed operations and supply chain management researchers during the 2009 INFORMS meeting in San Diego. Our findings characterize the diversity in terms of three “gaps”: a definition gap in how researchers define SCRM, a process gap in terms of inadequate coverage of response to risk incidents, and a methodology gap in terms of inadequate use of empirical methods. We also list ways to close these gaps as suggested by the researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Cited by
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
van Hoek, R. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2020-0165 · Cited by 850
A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda
Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2017-0043 · Cited by 554
Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667 · Cited by 452
Ivanov, D., Tang, C. S., Dolgui, A., Battini, D., & Das, A. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1798035 · Cited by 452
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sodhi, M. S., Son, B., & Tang, C. S.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W1824237519
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 78.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Researchers' Perspectives on Supply Chain Risk Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x
- The paper
- Sodhi, M. S., Son, B., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers' Perspectives on Supply Chain Risk Management. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.