The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the extant literature on supply chain risk management (SCRM, including risk identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring), developing a comprehensive definition and conceptual framework; to evaluate prior theory use; and to identify future research directions. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review of 354 articles (published 2000-2016) based on descriptive, thematic, and content analysis. Findings: There has been a considerable focus on identifying risk types and proposing risk mitigation strategies. Research has emphasised organisational responses to supply chain risks and made only limited use of theory. Ten key future research directions are identified. Research limitations/implications: A broad, contemporary understanding of SCRM is provided; and a new, comprehensive definition is presented covering the process, pathway, and objectives of SCRM, leading to a conceptual framework. The research agenda guides future work towards maturation of the discipline. Practical implications: Managers are encouraged to adopt a holistic approach to SCRM. Guidance is provided on how to select appropriate risk treatment actions according to the probability and impact of a risk. Originality/value: The first review to consider theory use in SCRM research and to use four SCRM stages to structure the review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004) · MIT Sloan Management Review · Cited by 1,860
The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities
Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x · Cited by 1,685
Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research
Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675560310001627016 · Cited by 1,630
Supply chain risk management: a literature review
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467 · Cited by 1,363
Global supply chain risk management strategies
Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810866986 · Cited by 1,252
Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub‐supplier accident
Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030410545463 · Cited by 1,037
Jüttner, U. (2005) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090510617385 · Cited by 1,025
Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management
Tang, O., & Nurmaya Musa, S. (2011) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013 · Cited by 979
Cited by
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Cariou, P., & Notteboom, T. (2023) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2022.2088708 · Cited by 20
Farmers’ markets or the supermarket? Channel selection in small farming businesses
Cortes, J. D., Jackson, J. E., & Cortes, A. F. (2024) · New England Journal of Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/neje-07-2022-0045 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-01-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 205-230
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2782924970
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 60.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2017-0043
- The paper
- Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2017-0043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.