The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Do Instructional Designers Actually Do? An Initial Investigation of Expert Practice
Abstract
We have a large body of literature that describes and prescribes how to design instruction but a poor understanding of what expert instructional designers actually do in practice. This paper describes a study in which expert and novice designers were asked to think aloud as they solved a design problem. The resulting protocols were analyzed and compared. Important differences were identified between experts and novices and between apparent characteristics of expertise and descriptions of instructional design in the literature. The implications of these differences for assisting and training instructional designers are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Cited by
McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2 · Cited by 161
Knowledge and Skills Needed by Instructional Designers in Higher Education
Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Kumar, S. (2015) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1002/piq.21196 · Cited by 107
Sharif, A., & Cho, S. (2015) · RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal · doi:10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176 · Cited by 73
Brill, J. M. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9421-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowland, G.
- Venue
- Performance Improvement Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65-86
- ISSN
- 0898-5952 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147268441
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
