Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Aging on Brainstem Responses to Toneburst Auditory Stimuli: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study in Dogs

Ter Haar, G., Venker-van Haagen, A.J., Van Den Brom, W.E., Van Sluijs, F.J., Smoorenburg, G.F.·2008·Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: It is assumed that the hearing of dogs becomes impaired with advancing age, but little is known about the prevalence and electrophysiologic characteristics of presbycusis in this species. Hypothesis: As in humans, hearing in dogs becomes impaired with aging across the entire frequency range, but primarily in the high-frequency area. This change can be assessed quantitatively by brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA). Animals: Three groups of 10 mixed-breed dogs with similar body weights but different mean ages were used. At the start of the study, the mean age was 1.9 years (range, 0.9–3.4) in group I, 5.7 years (3.5–7) in group II, and 12.7 years (11–14) in group III. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, the BERA audiograms obtained with toneburst stimuli were compared among the 3 groups. In a longitudinal study, changes in auditory thresholds of group II dogs were followed for 7 years. Results: Thresholds were significantly higher in group III than in groups I and II at all frequencies tested, and higher in group II than in group I at 4 kHz. The audiograms in group II indicated a progressive increase in thresholds associated with aging starting around 8–10 years of age and most pronounced in the middle- to high-frequency region (8–32 kHz). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Age-related hearing loss in these dogs started around 8–10 years of age and encompassed the entire frequency range, but started and progressed most rapidly in the middle- to high-frequency area. Its progression can be followed by BERA with frequency-specific stimulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0126.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dog hearing becomes impaired around 8-10 years of age, with loss across the entire frequency range but primarily in the high-frequency area, similar to humans.

    “At around 8–10 years of age, the hearing of dogs becomes impaired. The hearing loss is across the entire frequency range, although primarily in the high‐frequency area, just like humans. (Ter Haar, Venker‐van Haagen, van den Brom, van Sluijs, & Smoorenburg, 2008).”

    From Dog‐assisted therapy in the dental clinic. Part B. Hazards and assessment of potential risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog (2019) · cites this paper as Ter Haar, Venker‐van Haagen, van den Brom, van Sluijs, & Smoorenburg, 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Gates, 2005, Presbycusis, Lancet, 366, 1111, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67423-5 · DOI
  2. Lee, 2005, Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons, Ear Hear, 26, 1, 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00001 · DOI
  3. Sajjadi, 2000, The Ear: Comprehensive Otology, 545
  4. Willott, 2001, Modulation of presbycusis, Current status and future directions, 6, 231
  5. Nelson, 2006, Presbycusis, A human temporal bone study of individuals with downward sloping audiometric patterns of hearing loss and review of the literature, 116, 1
  6. Jennings, 2001, Presbycusis, J Laryngol Otol, 115, 171, 10.1258/0022215011906984 · DOI
  7. Ohlemiller, 2006, Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss, Brain Res, 1091, 89, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.017 · DOI
  8. Toppila, 2001, Age and noise-induced hearing loss, Scand Audiol, 30, 236, 10.1080/01050390152704751 · DOI
  9. Gates, 1999, Genetic associations in age-related hearing thresholds, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 125, 654, 10.1001/archotol.125.6.654 · DOI
  10. Seidman, 2002, Molecular mechanisms of age-related hearing loss, Ageing Res Rev, 1, 331, 10.1016/S1568-1637(02)00004-1 · DOI
  11. Balaban, 2005, Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging, Cell, 120, 483, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Krause, 2007, Aging, A revisited theory based on free radicals generated by NOX family NADPH oxidases, 42, 256
  13. Enrietto, 1999, Aging effects on auditory and vestibular responses, A longitudinal study, 20, 371
  14. Moscicki, 1985, Hearing loss in the elderly, An epidemiologic study of the Framingham heart study cohort, 6, 184
  15. Robinson, 1979, Age effect in hearing—A comparative analysis of published threshold data, Audiology, 18, 320, 10.1080/00206097909072634 · DOI
  16. Pedersen, 1989, Changes in pure-tone thresholds in individuals aged 70–81, Results from a longitudinal study, 28, 194
  17. Brant, 1990, Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging, J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 813, 10.1121/1.399731 · DOI
  18. Gates, 2000, Longitudinal threshold changes in older males with audiometric notches, Hear Res, 141, 220, 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00223-3 · DOI
  19. Knowles, 1988, Auditory-evoked responses of dogs with different hearing abilities, Can J Vet Res, 52, 394
  20. Knowles, 1989, Reduction of spiral ganglion neurons in the aging canine with hearing loss, J Vet Med, 36, 188, 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1989.tb00719.x · DOI
  21. Shimada, 1998, Age-related changes in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of dogs, J Vet Med Sci, 60, 41, 10.1292/jvms.60.41 · DOI
  22. Poncelet, 2002, Audiograms estimated from brainstem tone-evoked potentials in dogs from 10 days to 1.5 months of age, J Vet Intern Med, 16, 674, 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb02407.x · DOI
  23. Poncelet, 2006, Brains stem auditory potentials evoked by clicks in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs, Res Vet Sci, 80, 167, 10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.05.004 · DOI
  24. Markessis, 2006, Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (ASSEPs), A study of optimal stimulation parameters for frequency-specific threshold measurement in dogs, 117, 1760
  25. Ter Haar, 2002, Click and low-, middle, and high-frequency toneburst stimulation of the canine cochlea, J Vet Intern Med, 16, 274, 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb02369.x · DOI
  26. Goldston, 1995, Geriatrics & Gerontology of the Dog and Cat, 1
  27. Boettcher, 2002, Presbyacusis and the auditory brainstem response, J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 1249, 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/100) · DOI
  28. Sims, 1988, Electrodiagnostic evaluation of auditory function, Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 18, 913, 10.1016/S0195-5616(88)50090-6 · DOI
  29. Sims, 1984, Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog, Early latency components, 45, 2019
  30. Venker-van Haagen, 1989, Auditory brainstem responses in the normal beagle, Vet Quart, 11, 129, 10.1080/01652176.1989.9694211 · DOI
  31. Kawasaki, 1994, Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs, Vet Res Commun, 18, 383, 10.1007/BF01839289 · DOI
  32. Marshall, 1985, Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog, Am J Vet Res, 46, 966, 10.2460/ajvr.1985.46.04.966 · DOI
  33. Ohlemiller, 2004, Age-related hearing loss, The status of Schuknecht's typology, 12, 439
  34. Heffner, 1983, Hearing in large and small dogs, Absolute thresholds and size of the tympanic membrane, 97, 310
  35. Purdy, 1989, Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses, Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal-hearing adults, 28, 82
  36. Stapells, 1990, Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults, Audiology, 29, 262, 10.3109/00206099009072857 · DOI
  37. Stapells, 1985, The Auditory Brainstem Response, 147
  38. Yamada, 1975, Clinical evaluation of the auditory evoked brain stem response, Auris-Nasus-Larynx, 2, 97, 10.1016/S0385-8146(75)80011-3 · DOI
  39. Kodera, 1983, Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brainstem responses, Audiology, 22, 209
  40. Davis, 1985, Threshold sensitivity and frequency specificity in auditory brainstem response audiometry, Audiology, 24, 54, 10.3109/00206098509070097 · DOI
  41. Zanten, 1984, Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise, Audiology, 23, 253, 10.3109/00206098409072838 · DOI
  42. Fausti, 1991, Reliability of evoked responses to high-frequency (8–14 kHz) tone bursts, J Am Acad Audiol, 2, 105
  43. Gorga, 1983, Some issues relevant to the measurement of frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses, Sem Hear, 4, 353, 10.1055/s-0028-1094197 · DOI
  44. Uzuka, 1998, Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs, J Vet Intern Med, 12, 22, 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb00492.x · DOI
  45. Silman, 1991, Auditory Diagnosis, Principles and Applications, 249
  46. Pearson, 1995, Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss, J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1196, 10.1121/1.412231 · DOI
  47. Smoorenburg, 1993, Risk of noise-induced hearing loss following exposure to Chinese firecrackers, Audiology, 32, 333, 10.3109/00206099309071864 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ter Haar, G., Venker-van Haagen, A. J., Van Den Brom, W. E., Van Sluijs, F. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, , Utrecht,
  • University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University Hearing Research Laboratories, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, , Utrecht,
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
937-945
ISSN
1939-1676
Cited by
33
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review