Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?

CARNES, NICHOLAS·2012·Legislative Studies Quarterly

Abstract

Working‐class citizens have been numerically underrepresented in policymaking institutions throughout most of America's history. Little is known, however, about the political consequences of this enduring feature of our democratic system. This essay examines the relationship between legislators' class backgrounds and their votes on economic policy in the House of Representatives during the twentieth century. Like ordinary Americans, representatives from working‐class occupations exhibit more liberal economic preferences than other legislators, especially those from profit‐oriented professions. These findings provide the first evidence of a link between the descriptive and substantive representation of social classes in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Metadata

Authors
CARNES, N.
Venue
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-23
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
5-34
ISSN
  • 0362-9805 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9162
OpenAlex
W1774953003
Cited by
272
References
67
FWCI
71.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x
The paper
CARNES, N. (2012). Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.