The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Using Video Texts Supported with Advance Organizers and Captions on Chinese College Students' Listening Comprehension: An Empirical Study
Abstract
Listening plays a significant role in the language acquisition process and in communication, and its development as a key second/foreign language skill has gradually become of chief concern to language teachers and scholars. Applying high technology to furthering language learning is becoming commonplace. Most language teachers acknowledge that videos expose students to authentic materials and aid the identification of words and the clarification of unfamiliar cultural concepts. This study compares listening comprehension rates for video texts using a variety of techniques: advance organizers; captions; a combination of both; and none of the foregoing. The subjects of the study were 170 students at Ming‐Hsin Institute of Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan. They viewed four different video segments each attended with one of the four above‐listed treatments, and a Latin square design was used to collect data. After each viewing, a set of ten multiple
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This study focuses on captioning, which maximally exposes learners to the L2, and which has been proven to be beneficial for augmenting comprehension (Baltova, 1999;Chung, 1999;Markham, 2001) and fostering vocabulary learning (Markham, 1999;Sydorenko, 2010).”
From Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning (2014) · cites this paper as Chung, 1999
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1037/h0046669 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0045701 · DOI
- Baltova I.1994. “The Impact of Video on the Comprehension Skills of Core French StudentsCanadian Modern Language Review:507–523. · DOI
- Borras I., 1994, Effects of Multimedia Courseware Subtitling on the Speaking Performance of College Ctudents of French, Modem Language Journal, 78, 61, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02015.x · DOI
- 10.18806/tesl.v14i1.678 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00469.x · DOI · Paper page
- Krashen Stephen., 1982, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
- Lonergan J., 1989, Video in Language Teaching
- Katchen J.1995. “Listening Journals: A Way to Enhance sStudents' Listening StrategiesPaper presented AT the 12th annual ROC TEFL Conference at Tunghai University Taiwan.
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05416.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02032.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01122.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb01116.x · DOI
- Rubin J., 1990, Improving Foreign Language Listening Comprehensioon. Georgetown University Round Table
- Schmidt‐Rinehart Barbara., 1994, The Effects of Topic Familiarity on Second Language Listening Comprehension, Modern Language Journal, 78, 178
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb05396.x · DOI
- Shrum J. L., 1994, Teacher's Handbook
- Stern R. D., 1990, IN‐STAT: A Statistical Package for Microcomputers
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01173.x · DOI
- Teng H. C.1994. “Effects of Cultural Schemata and Visual Cues on Chinese Studetns' EFL Listening ComprehensionPaper presented at the 11th National Conference on English Teaching R.O.C. Taipei.
- 10.1093/elt/42.4.272 · DOI
- Vanderplank Robert.1993. “A Very Verbal Medium: Language Learning Through Closed CaptionsTESOL Journal Autumn:10–14.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies
Danan, M. (2004) · Meta · doi:10.7202/009021ar · Cited by 406
Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013 · Cited by 347
Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44357 · Cited by 223
“Thus, our findings only provide limited support for the use of captions and keyword captions and therefore contradict previous research (e.g. Baltova, 1999; Chung, 1999; Markham, 2001).”
BackgroundResultChung, J. (2002) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb03157.x · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, J.
- Corresponding author
- Chung, Jing‐mei
- Venue
- Foreign Language Annals
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-308
- ISSN
- 0015-718X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9720
- OpenAlex
- W1974715622
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Foreign Language Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- listening comprehension, video text, advance organizers, captions, Chinese as a second language, foreign language listening, multimedia in language teaching, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review