The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seismic Signature of the Haughton Structure
Abstract
Abstract— The western flank of the Haughton impact structure was imaged with a reflection profile generating 9.8 km of subsurface information. Ten reflecting horizons were recognized and have been correlated via a sonic log with the Paleozoic limestone/dolomite rock sequences. The seismic section is dominated by a dense and complex compound fault system with variable attitudes. These steeply dipping faults penetrated the sedimentary rocks but showed no recognizable extension into the crystalline basement. According to the seismically recognized fracture zones of the western margin, the structure is significantly larger than previously estimated. Reconstruction of the crater on the basis of the seismic information and existing scaling relationships reveals a structure with an apparent diameter of 23.9 km, and an excavated cavity of 10.3 km width and 1.97 km depth. The estimated diameters of the transient crater and the central uplift are 12 km and 11 km respectively. The morphologically distinct ring zones do not have seismically recognizable subsurface signatures. The underlying crystalline basement rocks did not exhibit seismically mappable impact‐related zones of disturbance. In the central interior region, coherent reflection signals are virtually absent. Valuable information for this area was provided by a 10.26 km long refraction profile that indicated nearly uniform velocities (∼5000 m/s) to a considerable depth. Major lateral variations in the velocity field across the structure were not detected.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Haughton data suggest a fault dip of around 60° closest to the surface, becoming more listric with depth.
“In agreement with this, the Haughton data suggest a fault dip of around 60° closest to the surface, becoming more listric with depth (Scott and Hajnal 1988).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Scott and Hajnal 1988
A decrease in block dimensions inward of the rim is also observed in reflection seismic data from Haughton, and detailed land-based Haughton data suggest many minor displacements and discrete normal fault scarps within down-dropped blocks.
“This decrease in block dimensions inward of the rim is also observed in reflection seismic data from Haughton, although the much more detailed land-based data from Haughton also suggest a large number of relatively minor displacements and discrete normal fault scarps within the down-dropped blocks (Scott and Hajnal 1988).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Scott and Hajnal 1988
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Anderson C. E., 1980, A seismic reflection study of a probable astrobleme near Hartney, Manitoba, J. Can. Soc. Exp. Geophys, 16, 7
- 10.1130/MEM97-p97 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01283.x · DOI
- Bischoff L., 1986, Der Haughton Dome, multidisziplinare untersuchung eins meteoritenkraters in Nordkanada [in German], Geowissenschaften in unserer Zeit, 4, 105
- Brown A. R., 1973, A detailed seismic study of Gosses Bluff Northern Territory, Bureau of Min. Resources, Australia, 42
- 10.1007/978-94-017-3641-1 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB090iS02p0C828 · DOI · Paper page
- Croft S. K., 1981, The modification stage of basin formation: Conditions of ring formation, Multi-ring Basins, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf, 12, 227
- Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 247
- 10.1190/1.1438126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1747-5457.1981.tb00931.x · DOI
- 10.14430/arctic2646 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Constraints on the formation of ring impact structures, based on terrestrial data, Multi-ring Basins, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf, 12, 37
- 10.1029/JB093iB10p11930 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01284.x · DOI
- 10.1029/JB087iB03p01849 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG021i008p01667 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00800.x · DOI
- 10.1029/JB092iB13p14113 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
- Kirby S. H., 1984, Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks, III, 139
- Mayr U., 1978, Stratigraphy and correlation of lower Paleozoic formations, subsurface of Cornwallis, Devon, Sommerset, and Russel Islands, Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Bull. Geol. Survey of Canada, 276, 1
- Mayr U., 1978, Subsurface stratigraphy, conodont zonation, and organic metamorphism of the Lower Paleozoic succession, Bjorne Peninsula, Ellesmere Island, District of Franklin, Scientific and Technical Papers in Current Research Part A, Geol. Survey of Canada, 78, 393
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01282.x · DOI
- Pohl J., 1985, First results of a multidisciplinary analysis of the Haughton Dome impact structure, Devon Island, Canada. III Geophysics (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 16, 669
- Pohl J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 343
- 10.1139/e83-101 · DOI
- Robertson P. B., 1985, First results of a multidisciplinary analysis of the Haughton impact crater, Devon Island, Canada. I Geology (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 16, 702
- Sawatzky H. B., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 446
- ScottD. L.(1988)A seismic study of the Haughton crater Devon Island Canadian Arctic.M.Sc. thesis University of Saskatchewan 143pp.
- 10.1190/1.1440058 · DOI
- ToddB. J.(1979)Gravity study of Haughton Dome Devon Island Northwest Territories.B.Sc. thesis University of Western Ontario 68pp.
- Yilmaz O., 1987, Seismic Data Processing. Investigations in Geophysics No. 2, 526
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, D., & Hajnal, Z.
- Venue
- Meteoritics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-247
- ISSN
- 0026-1114
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review