Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural analysis of the collar of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa—Significance for impact‐related deformation and central uplift formation

Wieland, Frank, Gibson, Roger L., Reimold, Wolf Uwe·2005·Meteoritics & Planetary Science

Abstract

Abstract— Landsat TM, aerial photograph image analysis, and field mapping of Witwatersrand supergroup meta‐sedimentary strata in the collar of the Vredefort Dome reveals a highly heterogeneous internal structure involving folds, faults, fractures, and melt breccias that are interpreted as the product of shock deformation and central uplift formation during the 2.02 Ga Vredefort impact event. Broadly radially oriented symmetric and asymmetric folds with wavelengths ranging from tens of meters to kilometers and conjugate radial to oblique faults with strike‐slip displacements of, typically, tens to hundreds of meters accommodated tangential shortening of the collar of the dome that decreased from ˜17% at a radius from the dome center of 21 km to <5% at a radius of 29 km. Ubiquitous shear fractures containing pseudotachylitic breccia, particularly in the metapelitic units, display local slip senses consistent with either tangential shortening or tangential extension; however, it is uncertain whether they formed at the same time as the larger faults or earlier, during the shock pulse. In addition to shatter cones, quartzite units show two fracture types—a cmspaced rhomboidal to orthogonal type that may be the product of shock‐induced deformation and later joints accomplishing tangential and radial extension. The occurrence of pseudotachylitic breccia within some of these later joints, and the presence of radial and tangential dikes of impact melt rock, confirm the impact timing of these features and are suggestive of late‐stage collapse of the central uplift.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00416.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collar rocks at Vredefort indicate that uplift and rotation to near-vertical to overturned attitudes occurred prior to outward-directed radial thrusting, with variation likely due to a pre-impact regional dip.

    “The collar rocks at Vredefort indicate that uplift and rotation to near vertical to overturned attitudes, with the variation likely due to the effect of a pre-impact regional dip (Lana et al. 2003;Wieland et al. 2005), occurred prior to the outward-directed radial thrusting (Simpson 1978;Brink et al. 1997).”
  • Both Vredefort and Sudbury display the classic pattern of upturning of lithologies and exposure of deeper stratigraphic levels in parautochthonous crater-floor rocks as the center is approached.

    “Both the Vredefort and Sudbury structures display the classic pattern of the upturning of lithologies and the exposure of deeper stratigraphic levels in the parautochthonous rocks of the crater floor, as the center of the structure is approached (Lana et al. 2003;Riller 2005;Wieland et al. 2005).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Albat H. M., 1988, Shatter cone/bedding interrelationship in the Vredefort structure: Evidence for meteorite impact, South African Journal of Geology, 91, 106
  2. 10.1016/0040-1951(89)90248-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90090-U · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0301-9268(91)90074-K · DOI
  5. Bischoff L., 1994, Der Araguainha‐Krater in Brasilien, Geowissenschaften, 12, 355
  6. Bisschoff A. A., 1982, Thermal metamorphism in the Vredefort Dome, Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 85, 43
  7. Bisschoff A. A., 2000, The Geology of the Vredefort Dome (Explanation of Geological Sheets 2627CA, CB, CC, CD, DA, DC, and 2727AA, AB, BA, 1:50,000 scale), 49
  8. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01283.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00175-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90089-Q · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00340.x · DOI
  13. 10.1086/626768 · DOI
  14. 10.1130/0016-7606(1962)73[1:AOBSSO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1029/GD013p0077 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90097-R · DOI
  18. Friese A. E. W., 1995, Tectonic processes within the Kaapvaal Craton during the Kibaran (Grenville) Orogeny: Structural, geophysical, and isotopic constraints from the Witwatersrand Basin and environs, 62
  19. Gibson R. L., 1993, When is a hornfels not a hornfels? Metapelitic rocks from the lower Witwatersrand supergroup, Vredefort Dome, South Africa, South African Journal of Geology, 96, 42
  20. Gibson R. L., 1996, The Vredefort hornfelses revisited, South African Journal of Geology, 99, 93
  21. Gibson R. L., 2001, The Vredefort impact structure (The scientific evidence and a two‐day excursion guide), 111
  22. 10.1130/0-8137-2384-1.329 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/gj.3350300311 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00013-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0787:TMSOAI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  26. 10.2113/1030175 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90098-S · DOI
  29. Hargraves R. B., 1961, Shatter cones in the rocks of the Vredefort ring, Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 64, 147
  30. 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80058-9 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Holland M. J., 1990, Tectonic control on the deposition of the Turffontein subgroup around the Vredefort Dome, South African Journal of Geology, 93, 158
  32. IvanovB. A. KocharyanG. G. KostuchenkoV. N. KirjakovA. F. andPevznerL. A.1996.Puchezh‐Katunki impact crater: Preliminary data on recovered core block structure(abstract). 27th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.589–590.
  33. 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00180-X · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01508.x · DOI
  35. 10.1130/0-8137-2384-1.85 · DOI
  36. KillickA. M.1993.Pseudotachylites of the West Rand goldfield Witwatersrand Basin South Africa.Ph.D. thesis Rand Afrikaans University Johannesburg South Africa.273p.
  37. 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0913:ROIAGS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1029/1998JE000587 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01086-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90137-6 · DOI · Paper page
  42. LillyP. A.1978.Deformation in the collar rocks of the Vredefort ring structure.Ph.D. thesis University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.430p.
  43. MantonW. I.1962.The orientation and implication of shatter cones in the Vredefort ring structure.M.Sc. thesis University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.167p.
  44. Manton W. I., 1965, The orientation and origin of shatter cones in the Vredefort ring, Geological Problems in Lunar Research., 123, 1017
  45. 10.1038/277495b0 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90167-G · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1992.tb00102.x · DOI
  48. McCarthy T. S., 1990, Geological studies related to the origin of the Witwatersrand Basin and its mineralization: An introduction and a strategy for research and exploration, South African Journal of Geology, 93, 1
  49. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process, 245
  50. Melosh H. J., 2005, The mechanics of pseudotachylite formation in impact events, 55
  51. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
  52. Milton D. J., 1996, Gosses Bluff, a latest Jurassic impact structure, central Australia. Part 1: Geological structure, stratigraphy, and origin, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16, 453
  53. Moser D. E., 1996, Program and abstracts of the Geological Association of Canada, 67
  54. Myers R. E., 1990, A tectono‐sedimentary reconstruction of the development and evolution of the Witwatersrand Basin, with particular emphasis on the Central Rand group, South African Journal of Geology, 93, 180
  55. Nel L. T., 1927, The geology of the country around Vredefort., 134
  56. 10.1029/1998JB900068 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/0169-1368(94)90017-5 · DOI
  58. Pretorius D. A., 1986, Mineral deposits of southern Africa
  59. PybusG. Q. J.1995.Geological and mineralogical analysis of some mafic intrusions in the Vredefort Dome Central Witwatersrand Basin.M.Sc. thesis University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.376p.
  60. Reimold W. U., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 177
  61. Reimold W. U., 2005, “Pseudotachylites” in large impact structures, 1
  62. ReimoldW. U. HorschH. andDurrheimR. J.1990.The “bronzite”—granophyre from the Vredefort structure—A detailed analytical study and reflections on the origin of one of Vredefort's enigmas(abstract). 20th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.433–450.
  63. 10.1016/S0899-5362(00)80004-4 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90087-O · DOI
  65. Simpson C., 1978, The structure of the rim synclinorium of the Vredefort Dome, Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 81, 115
  66. Therriault A. M., 1996, The Vredefort Granophyre: Field studies, South African Journal of Geology, 99, 1
  67. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01242.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.2113/105.2.107 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90088-P · DOI
  70. WilshireH. G. OffieldT. W. HowardK. A. andCummingsD.1972.Geology of the Sierra Madera cryptoexplosion structure Pecos County Texas.USGS Professional Paper #599‐H.42p. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wieland, F., Gibson, R. L., & Reimold, W. U.
Venue
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
40
Issue
9-10
Pages
1537-1554
ISSN
  • 1086-9379
  • 1945-5100
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review