The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science
Abstract
This article addresses and attempts to refute several of the most widespread and enduring misconceptions held by students regarding the enterprise of science. The ten myths discussed include the common notions that theories become laws, that hypotheses are best characterized as educated guesses, and that there is a commonly‐applied scientific method. In addition, the article includes discussion of other incorrect ideas such as the view that evidence leads to sure knowledge, that science and its methods provide absolute proof, and that science is not a creative endeavor. Finally, the myths that scientists are objective, that experiments are the sole route to scientific knowledge and that scientific conclusions are continually reviewed conclude this presentation. The paper ends with a plea that instruction in and opportunities to experience the nature of science are vital in preservice and inservice teacher education programs to help unseat the myths of science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10086 · Cited by 485
Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3‐year professional development program
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20159 · Cited by 334
Muris, P., & Otgaar, H. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01363-0 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- McComas, W. F.
- Venue
- School Science and Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-16
- ISSN
- 0036-6803 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-8594
- OpenAlex
- W2052490387
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10205.x
- The paper
- McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10205.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.