The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explicate the impact of an 8‐week science apprenticeship program on a group of high‐ability secondary students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Ten volunteers (Grades 10–11) completed a modified version of the Views of Nature of Science, Form B both before and after their apprenticeship to assess their conceptions of key aspects of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Semistructured exit interviews provided an opportunity for students to describe the nature of their apprenticeship experiences and elaborate on their written questionnaire responses. Semistructured exit interviews were also conducted with the scientists who served as mentors for each of the science apprentices. For the most part, students held conceptions about the nature of science and scientific inquiry that were inconsistent with those described in current reforms. Participating science mentors held strong convictions that their apprentices had learned much about the scientific enterprise in the course of doing the science in their apprenticeship. Although most students did appear to gain knowledge about the processes of scientific inquiry, their conceptions about key aspects of the nature of science remained virtually unchanged. Epistemic demand and reflection appeared to be crucial components in the single case where a participant experienced substantial gains in her understandings of the nature of science and inquiry. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 40: 487–509, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 14,874
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research
Lederman, N. G. (1992) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404 · Cited by 2,169
Self-citationShapin, S. (2018) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226398488.001.0001 · Cited by 1,587
National Science Education Standards: (302882005-001)
The National Academy of Sciences; The Center for Education (1996) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e302882005-001 · Cited by 1,555
Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science
Matthews, M. R. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,374
The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199807)82:4<417::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 1,015
Self-citationInquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057 · Cited by 688
Cited by
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10128 · Cited by 851
Self-citationChemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x · Cited by 757
Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice
Sadler, T. D. (2009) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260802681839 · Cited by 667
Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027 · Cited by 207
Hughes, R. M., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. J. (2013) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 487-509
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2006590485
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 59.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.10086
- The paper
- Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.