Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsSoftware Engineering and Design Patterns

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women's Livelihoods, Global Markets and Citizenship

Open access
Thekkudan, Julie, Tandon, Rajesh·2009·IDS Working Papers
DOI 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00336_2.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Summary: The underlying assumption of the economic integration epitomised by globalisation was that it would lead to greater economic participation and an enhancement of livelihood opportunities, which in turn would have positive impacts on citizens and their practice of citizenship. This integration would open new spaces and create new mechanisms for interaction between various actors in governance processes. Economic participation in the global economy manifests in two principal ways: the export of local products for global marketing through multinational corporations (MNCs), or the local marketing of goods that are globally produced by MNCs. Both models have the potential to increase livelihood opportunities for the poor and those hitherto excluded from the market. If the second model is followed, what avenues for market integration might create more sustainable livelihoods for rural women? Can this model provide a sustainable source of income for such women? As rural women are integrated into global markets, what are the implications for their identities? Do they see themselves as an integral part of the global marketplace, with important links to the global economy? Or do they continue to maintain local, regional or maybe national identities? When these women claim rights, to whom do they turn? Do they ask governments to mediate on their behalf? Do they consider the medium of their integration, the MNCs, as their obligator? What kinds of organising efforts evolve for such claim‐making purposes? This paper attempts to answer these questions through an analysis of Project Shakti, an initiative of Hindustan Unilever Limited, promoted by the Indian government.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00336_2.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bhattacharya M., 2004, Globalisation: Perspectives in Women's Studies
  2. Clark J., 2001, Global Citizen Action
  3. Friedman T.L., 2005, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Globalised World in the Twenty‐First Century
  4. Gaventa J., 2007, Mapping the Public Policy Landscape: From Local to Global
  5. Gaventa J., 2001, Global Citizen Action
  6. Haufler V., 2008, Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society
  7. Held D., 2002, Governing Globalisation: Power, Authority and Global Governance
  8. Jones E., 2002, IDS Development Bibliography
  9. Masika R., 1996, Employment and Sustainable Livelihoods: A Gender Perspective
  10. Ramesh J., 2007, Self‐Help Groups Revolution: What Next, Economic and Political Weekly, 3621
  11. Tandon R., 2008, Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society
  12. Thakurta A.G., 2004, Globalisation: Perspectives in Women's Studies

Cited by

See all 12

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Thekkudan, J., & Tandon, R.
Affiliations
Society for Participatory Research in Asia (IN)
ORCID
Tandon, Rajesh
Venue
IDS Working Papers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10
Volume
2009
Issue
336
Pages
01-36
ISSN
  • 1353-6141 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-0209
DOI
10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00336_2.x
OpenAlex
W2163182458
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IDS Working Papers (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
Keywords
rural women, women's livelihoods, international markets, citizenship, economic integration, globalization, multinational corporations, Hindustan Unilever, women's economic participation, identity, claims-making, sustainable livelihoods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.