Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,772

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Report of the Committee on the Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus, Seino, Yutaka, Nanjo, Kishio, Tajima, Naoko, Kadowaki, Takashi, Kashiwagi, Atsunori, Araki, Eiichi, Ito, Chikako, Inagaki, Nobuya, Iwamoto, Yasuhiko, Kasuga, Masato, Hanafusa, Toshiaki, Haneda, Masakazu, Ueki, Kohjiro·2010·Journal of Diabetes Investigation

Abstract

Concept of Diabetes Mellitus: Diabetes mellitus is a group of diseases associated with various metabolic disorders, the main feature of which is chronic hyperglycemia due to insufficient insulin action. Its pathogenesis involves both genetic and environmental factors. The long-term persistence of metabolic disorders can cause susceptibility to specific complications and also foster arteriosclerosis. Diabetes mellitus is associated with a broad range of clinical presentations, from being asymptomatic to ketoacidosis or coma, depending on the degree of metabolic disorder. Classification (Tables 1 and 2, and Figure 1): Table 1. Etiological classification of diabetes mellitus and glucose metabolism disorders I. Type 1 (destruction of pancreatic β-cells, usually leading to absolute insulin deficiency) A. Autoimmune B. Idiopathic II. Type 2 (ranging from predominantly insulin secretory defect, to predominantly insulin resistance with varying degrees of insulin secretory defect) III. Due to other specific mechanisms or diseases (see Table 2 for details) A. Those in which specific mutations have been identified as a cause of genetic susceptibility (1) Genetic abnormalities of pancreatic β-cell function (2) Genetic abnormalities of insulin action B. Those associated with other diseases or conditions (1) Diseases of exocrine pancreas (2) Endocrine diseases (3) Liver disease (4) Drug- or chemical-induced (5) Infections (6) Rare forms of immune-mediated diabetes (7) Various genetic syndromes often associated with diabetes IV. Gestational diabetes mellitus Note: Those that cannot at present be classified as any of the above are called unclassifiable. The occurrence of diabetes-specific complications has not been confirmed in some of these conditions. Table 2. Diabetes mellitus and glucose metabolism disorders due to other specific mechanisms and diseases A. Those in which specific mutations have been identified as a cause of genetic susceptibility B. Those associated with other diseases or conditions (1) Genetic abnormalities of pancreatic β-cell functionInsulin gene (abnormal insulinemia, abnormal proinsulinemia, neonatal diabetes mellitus) HNF 4α gene (MODY1) Glucokinase gene (MODY2) HNF 1α gene (MODY3) IPF-1 gene (MODY4) HNF 1β gene (MODY5) Mitochondria DNA (MIDD) NeuroD1 gene (MODY6) Kir6.2 gene (neonatal diabetes mellitus) SUR1 gene (neonatal diabetes mellitus) AmylinOthers(2) Genetic abnormalities of insulin actionInsulin receptor gene (type A insulin resistance, leprechaunism, Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome etc.) Others (1) Diseases of exocrine pancreasPancreatitisTrauma/pancreatectomyNeoplasmHemochromatosisOthers(2) Endocrine diseasesCushing’s syndromeAcromegalyPheochromocytomaGlucagonomaAldosteronismHyperthyroidismSomatostatinomaOthers(3) Liver diseaseChronic hepatitisLiver cirrhosis Others(4) Drug- or chemical-inducedGlucocorticoidsInterferonOthers(5) InfectionsCongenital rubellaCytomegalovirusOthers(6) Rare forms of immune-mediated diabetesAnti-insulin receptor antibodiesStiffman syndromeInsulin autoimmune syndromeOthers(7) Various genetic syndromes often associated with diabetesDown syndromePrader-Willi syndromeTurner syndromeKlinefelter syndromeWerner syndromeWolfram syndromeCeruloplasmin deficiencyLipoatrophic diabetes mellitusMyotonic dystrophyFriedreich ataxiaLaurence-Moon-Biedl syndromeOthers The occurrence of diabetes-specific complications has not been confirmed in some of these conditions. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint A scheme of the relationship between etiology (mechanism) and patho-physiological stages (states) of diabetes mellitus. Arrows pointing right represent worsening of glucose metabolism disorders (including onset of diabetes mellitus). Among the arrow lines, indicates the condition classified as ‘diabetes mellitus’. Arrows pointing left represent improvement in the glucose metabolism disorder. The broken lines indicate events of low frequency. For example, in type 2 diabetes mellitus, infection can lead to ketoacidosis and require temporary insulin treatment for survival. Also, once diabetes mellitus has developed, it is treated as diabetes mellitus regardless of improvement in glucose metabolism, therefore, the arrow lines pointing left are filled in black. In such cases, a broken line is used, because complete normalization of glucose metabolism is rare. The classification of glucose metabolism disorders is principally derived from etiology, and includes staging of pathophysiology based on the degree of deficiency of insulin action. These disorders are classified into four groups: (i) type 1 diabetes mellitus; (ii) type 2 diabetes mellitus; (iii) diabetes mellitus due to other specific mechanisms or diseases; and (iv) gestational diabetes mellitus. Type 1 diabetes is characterized by destruction of pancreatic β-cells. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by combinations of decreased insulin secretion and decreased insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). Glucose metabolism disorders

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00074.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Kuzuya N, 1970, Report of the committee on the diagnostic criteria of the oral glucose tolerance test for diabetes mellitus, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 13, 1
  2. Kosaka K, 1982, Report of the committee on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 25, 859
  3. Kadowaki T, 2008, Report of the Japan Diabetes Society’s Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism Disorder—A New Category of Fasting Plasma Glucose Values: “high‐normal”, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 51, 281
  4. Shima K, 1994, Interlaboratory difference in HbA1c measurement in Japan—the interim report of the committee on an interlaboratory standardization of HbA1c determination, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 37, 855
  5. Kashiwagi A, 2009, Consensus and Statement on International Standardization of HbA1C in Japan: Committee Report on Diabetes Mellitus Laboratory Testing Standardization, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 52, 811
  6. Kobayashi T, 1998, The position of type 1 in the classification of diabetes mellitus, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 41, A11
  7. Kobayashi T, 1996, Advances in Diabetes Study
  8. Froguel P, 1997, Genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of maturity‐onset diabetes of the young, Diabetes Rev, 5, 123
  9. Nanjo K, 1998, Recent aspects on diabetes mellitus associated with gene mutation in Japan, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 41, A29
  10. Ito C, 2008, Classification of fasting plasma glucose levels and HbA1c, Health screen (Ningen Dock), 22, 874
  11. Tominaga M, 2008, Lifestyle habits as factors in developing diabetes mellitus – from results of Funagata research focused on prospective cohort study in Japan, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 51, 473
  12. Kosaka K, 1998, Various parameters used for the diagnosis of diabetes and for the epidemiological investigation—their characteristics, their mutual relationship and their application, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 41, A101
  13. Sasaki A, 1999, Diabetology 99, 97
  14. Kuzuya T, 1997, Answers by Council members of JDS to a questionnaire on the diagnostic criteria and classification of diabetes mellitus, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 40, 203
  15. Ito C, 1998, OGTT criteria seen from the relation of fasting and 2‐hPG and complications, J Jpn Diabetes Soc, 41, A33
  16. KosakaK.Progress in diabetology. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Critical matters on the new diagnositic criteria in the 1997 ADA report and 1998 WHO report. Shindan to Chiryo2002;90:851–861(Japanese).

Cited by

See all 1,772

Metadata

Authors
The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus, Seino, Y., Nanjo, K., Tajima, N., Kadowaki, T., Kashiwagi, A., Araki, E., Ito, C., Inagaki, N., Iwamoto, Y., Kasuga, M., Hanafusa, T., Haneda, M., & Ueki, K.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
212-228
ISSN
  • 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-1124
OpenAlex
W2097395605
Cited by
1,772
References
46
FWCI
106.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report of the Committee on the Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00074.x
The paper
The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus, Seino, Y., Nanjo, K., Tajima, N., Kadowaki, T., Kashiwagi, A., Araki, E., Ito, C., Inagaki, N., Iwamoto, Y., Kasuga, M., Hanafusa, T., Haneda, M., & Ueki, K. (2010). Report of the Committee on the Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00074.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.