Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making overall dynamic body acceleration work: on the theory of acceleration as a proxy for energy expenditure

Gleiss, Adrian C., Wilson, Rory P., Shepard, Emily L. C.·2011·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Summary: 1. The energetic costs of different behaviours are critical in modulating the behavioural ecology of free‐living animals. Despite this, measurement of energy expenditure in the field has proved difficult. 2. A new method with broad application for field studies has been proposed for determining the rate at which animals expend energy, based on measurements of overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) through the attachment of miniature acceleration data‐loggers. This technique is easy to implement and has the promise to be able to resolve energy expenditure with fine (sub‐second) temporal resolution, making it the only method which promises to able to determine the cost of short‐lived behaviours. Increasing evidence supports the validity of the approach although the rationale behind it is vague. 3. This study explores link between metabolic energy and acceleration by examining what is known about how muscular tissue converts metabolic energy to mechanical work via muscular contraction and how Newtonian physics facilitates a derivation of Power (the rate at which work is performed) from acceleration. The link between metabolic energy and acceleration appears to involve three discrete processes: (i) the ratio of mechanical work to metabolic work performed by a single muscle (mechano‐chemical efficiency); (ii) the ratio of external and internal work performed (mechanical work of the limbs in relation to that of the centre of mass); and (iii) the ratio of inertial to de novo mechanical work. These processes may vary according to the animal’s mass, the medium in which it travels and its gait or behaviour. 4. Assessment of movement has limited application in defining non‐movement energy expenditure such as that involved in specific dynamic action or non‐shivering thermogenesis. However, this non‐movement energy expenditure may often be modelled with reasonable confidence. The utility and appropriateness of the ODBA‐energy expenditure method depends on a set of conditions, which we define and suggest should be assessed a priori. 5. This study explores the framework behind the ODBA‐energy expenditure method to enable informed decisions to be made regarding the suitability for specific research questions addressed, as well as highlighting calibration needs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00057.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Gleiss, A. C., Wilson, R. P., & Shepard, E. L. C.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
23-33
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1786819714
Cited by
472
References
3
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making overall dynamic body acceleration work: on the theory of acceleration as a proxy for energy expenditure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00057.x
The paper
Gleiss, A. C., Wilson, R. P., & Shepard, E. L. C. (2011). Making overall dynamic body acceleration work: on the theory of acceleration as a proxy for energy expenditure. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00057.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.