The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies
Abstract
Summary: 1. Unresolved nodes in phylogenetic trees (polytomies) have long been recognized for their influences on specific phylogenetic metrics such as topological imbalance measures, diversification rate analysis and measures of phylogenetic diversity. However, no rigorously tested, biologically appropriate method has been proposed for overcoming the effects of this phylogenetic uncertainty. 2. Here, we present a simple approach to polytomy resolution, using biologically relevant models of diversification. Using the powerful and highly customizable phylogenetic inference and analysis software beast and r, we present a semi‐automated ‘polytomy resolver’ capable of providing a distribution of tree topologies and branch lengths under specified biological models. 3. Utilizing both simulated and empirical data sets, we explore the effects and characteristics of this approach on two widely used phylogenetic tree statistics, Pybus’ gamma (γ) and Colless’ normalized tree imbalance (Ic). Using simulated pure birth trees, we find no evidence of bias in either estimate using our resolver. Applying our approach to a recently published Cetacean phylogeny, we observed the expected small positive bias in γ and decrease in Ic. 4. We further test the effect of polytomy resolution on diversification rate analysis using the Cetacean phylogeny. We demonstrate that using a birth–death model to resolve the Cetacean tree with 20%, 40% and 60% of random nodes collapsed to polytomies gave qualitatively similar patterns regarding the tempo and mode of diversification as the same analyses on the original, fully resolved phylogeny. 5. Finally, we applied the birth–death polytomy resolution approach to a large (>5000 tips), but unresolved, supertree of extant mammals. We report a distribution of fully resolved model‐based trees, which should be useful for many future analysis of the mammalian supertree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082
Violin Plots: A Box Plot-Density Trace Synergism
Hintze, J. L., & Nelson, R. D. (1998) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1998.10480559 · Cited by 1,802
Drummond, A. J., Nicholls, G. K., Rodrigo, A. G., & Solomon, W. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1307 · Cited by 1,059
Fritz, S. A., Bininda‐Emonds, O. R. P., & Purvis, A. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01307.x · Cited by 585
Cited by
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494 · Cited by 1,201
Linear and generalized linear mixed models
Bolker, B. M. (2015) · Ecological Statistics · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0014 · Cited by 339
Oliveira, A. G. D., Peláez, O., & Agostinho, A. A. (2021) · Neotropical Ichthyology · doi:10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0034 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, T. S., Mooers, A. Ø., & Thomas, G. H.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-436
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132578265
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00103.x
- The paper
- Kuhn, T. S., Mooers, A. Ø., & Thomas, G. H. (2011). A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00103.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.